<p>I read in the SAT optional thread about some changes that had been initiated by Pres. Hatch that had been somewhat controversial, namely:</p>
<p>"While Hatch's recent onslaught of major changes to Wake Forest have been presented in succession more closely than they probably should have, I respect him for trying to improve the quality of Wake Forest. Hearn, President Emeritus, did an excellent job building Wake Forest into what it is today. However, we can't expect Hatch to leave Notre Dame, his alma mater, and not implement some of his own ideas within our university. Some argue that he is trying to mold Wake Forest into another Notre Dame with the implementation of "visiting hours" for opposite sex students in dorms and that our new letterhead "logo" looks like a bank's, but these changes will be, or already have been, accepted over time. Overall, the changes he is making will be accepted and I think they potentially will make Wake a more recognizable, higher-ranked national university.</p>
<hr>
<p>In summary, I realize that my ideas are rather scattered but I'm tired of hearing everyone complain about Hatch and the changes to Wake Forest. I don't necessarily agree with everything he's doing but I realize that change is enevitable and complaining won't stop him from continuing with his plans. Certain rules, such as removing Greek letters from the dorms, anger me and I think that the administration's reasoning is flawed, but I'm willing to try and remain optimistic about our future and trust the administration, who actually has experience in managing universities, knows what they're doing."</p>
<p>Can folks with first-hand knowledge of Wake Forest and these changes tell me more about these and any other changes that have been instituted by Pres. Hatch, his reasoning for making the changes, and the general on-campus reaction to the changes?</p>