<p>How much would this translate to for next Saturday?</p>
<p>750+. </p>
<p>I find that the questions on the Sparknotes tests are slightly more difficult than they should be (have you taken the test in the Blue Book? It’s ridiculously easy compared to the Sparknotes tests.) and the curve is slightly harsher than the real thing. You’ll be fine.</p>
<p>expect an 800. My friend scored 630 on one of the sparknotes test the night before and ended up getting a 790 on the real thing. The questions on the sparknotes are vague and twice as hard. I’m taking it in May and praying for a 780</p>
<p>I hope you guys are right. I’m taking the Chem SAT II in May too. I’ve taken two of the SparkNotes practice tests, and I got 570 on both of them. =(</p>
<p>Are you sure? I got the same, low 700s, I admit the test is harder than the stuff I did, like Princeton and McGraw Hill, But does the real test ask a lot of tricky questions like Sparknotes’ questions?</p>
<p>On a scale of 1 - 10, 1 being SAT II level and 10 being AP level,
I think Sparknotes is 5-7…
The topics covered include about 25% AP topics, AND the level of difficulty of the SAT II topics are also higher.</p>
<p>^ I disagree. I didn’t see anything that was remotely AP-level on the Sparknotes tests. They went into great depth about SAT II stuff but it didn’t touch any AP material at all.</p>
<p>Can anyone evaluate the difficulty of Barron’s? I just got a 700 on the Barrons test. I’m learning eletrochem this week, so that will be worth a few points.</p>
<p>Basically it isn’t much cause for worry (I’m aiming for 750+)?</p>
<p>i got low 500’s on REA, and high 600s with barron. low 600s with Princeton and high 500s with mcgraw. ended up with 740 on the real one. lol= =</p>