<p>Good luck finding a wife, joev, especially if you continue to think of your intimate life with your partner as an "obligation". Trust me, you wouldn't want to have sex with her if she felt she was fulfilling an obligation.</p>
<p>wow talk about a sexist...lol....good luck finding ANYONE that'll marry you...coming from a male</p>
<p>sorry to tell you...no woman will regularly have sex after a long period of time...unless she's sex crazy and then there's a higher propensity for her to cheat on you....and you know what...someone once told that relationships were..(gasp)..not strictly for sex</p>
<p>I don't know if I agree with that. Many women simply have sexual ruts for short periods of time, but find a sexual peak in their 30s-40s. After 5 years, it's not like my girlfriend is slowing down, either. (Yeah yeah, a bit personal, I know...but the point stands)</p>
<p>I know relationships are not strictly for sex, I am not an idiot. But sex is a HUGE part of relationships, if not the most important part after love of course. I realize that couples who have kids sometimes are so tired at night that they are too exhausted for sex sometimes. This is understandable. What I am complaining about/can't understand/see way too often are couples that as soon as they move in together/get married, the sex stops almost totally. Even you feminazis have to admit this is jacked up. Just saying that unless you have good communication about the situtation or you satisfy your husband/boyfriend's sexual needs, he has every right in the world to cheat on you.</p>
<p>NO. You do not have the right to cheat. You sign an agreement that states that you will be faithful for better or for worse. NO ifs, NO ands, NO buts.</p>
<p>Worse does not mean sexual laziness on the part of the cow. There is no law in any state which says this. I am not condoning cheating in any way, I am just saying that it is perfectly acceptable that if your wife does not at least * attempt * to meet your sexual needs, cheating should be * encouraged * to teach the cow a lesson.</p>
<p>Wrong. Some states have statutes that determine adultery to be illegal. It is however, rarely charged.</p>
<p>hmmm cheatings wrong all together...i know if my girlfriend cheated on me i'd be pretty heated/upset....and if i lived with her i'd throw most of her crap out the window and burn all her most cherished posessions as minor pay back...then i'd find some random chick and bang the hell outta her :p....you don't need to cheat if you're in love...if you feel that sex is more important than commitment then you shouldn't get in to a relationship.......cheating is condoned only when you've been cheated on!</p>
<p>furthermore...you're not going to get much action if you refer to your wife as "the cow"</p>
<p>I wasn't referring to anyone I have dated (well maybe the first finacee) as a cow, it just seems to me that most wives who do not give it up anymore have also put on like 50 lbs.</p>
<p>Lastly, if you are in love, then you are usually having sex regularly. I am not saying cheat on your significant other if they say they are too tired for sex just like one night LOL These relationships are where people haven't had sex in like 6 months to 2 years. Trust me I know many miserable married men and even women who are in this type of situtation.</p>
<p>hmmmmm....i dunno....i've seen several ppl in relationshiops who are not having sex</p>
<p>Joev, relationships are a two-way street. If a woman is not in the mood for months to years, it's a good bet there is something wrong in the relationship that is making her that way. The men who have gone without for significant periods of time would be wise to invest in a little self-reflection and a marriage counselor. I apologize for the tone of my first post; it was condescending. I think what I was trying to say was that men and women have different definitions of "regular" sex. A lot of men (especially younger men who haven't actually lived with a woman yet) think that people in a healthy relationship should have sex 5-7 times a week. Many women, though not all, I'm sure, think twice a week is plenty, and any more than that wouldn't be enjoyable.</p>
<p>Ok we are now back in the same ballpark. :)</p>
<p>5-7 times a week is kinda a stretch still</p>
<p>I agree that 5-7 times a week is a stretch. I think that is unrealistic, and honestly, I'd suspect that somehow that relationship would be an unhealthy one. I think the national average for married couples is twice a week.</p>
<p>When in college, we had a "Three's Company" scenario at times at our apartment. No one was having sex with the other apartment mates. That is the theory of co-ed rooms . But I still think that it is risky having the situation of co-ed rooms.</p>
<p>actually, very few ppl expect to have sex with roommates of the opposite sex...that is if the relationship is strictly roommate to roommate and not b/f g/f</p>
<p>"some nympho ho"</p>
<p>lmao</p>
<p>I would rather share a room with one of my guy friends from school than with one of my girl friends.. and i'm not talking about doing anything with that person.. just personal preference. i have a boyfriend of five years too.</p>
<p>I somewhat agree with fendergirl... I'd much rather share a room with a normal guy than a *****y girl. My best friend is a guy and I've roomed with two guys before on a vacation(my best friend and one of his guy friends). There was nothing sexual going on at all. I wouldn't mind rooming with a guy IF I wasn't attracted to him. If there got to be any sexual tension I think it'd get too wierd and I would regret making that decision.</p>
<p>I'd personally LOVE to have a male roommate as long as he's gay. Some of my favorite people in the world are gay guys. I'll actually be looking for one if I move off-campus as an upperclassman.</p>