<p>I have a really strange preference for college campuses. I like cohesion and consistency. It’s difficult to explain, but it has a lot to do with my gut feelings. My college search has had a lot of quirks (even some “stupid” stuff that is so discounted here) while maintaining a high level of requirement from each school. How long was I at work today? I’m not making any sense. Let me talk about the schools I’ve visited:</p>
<p>GEORGE WASHINGTON - Amazing. It was the most dismal day and I couldn’t understand a word my tour guide was saying (my fault, I’m bad with accents). The campus is tight-knit and completely cohesive, yet integrated into the city. It’s certainly not fully-integrated like NYU or even as integrated as BU. It has a defined campus. The visit completely dispelled the preppy myth - I saw plenty of “my people” there. The atmosphere was perfect, even on a rainy day.</p>
<p>AMERICAN - …wow. It was AWFUL. The school itself is broken up, with no consistency. All the buildings are completely different. There are only a handful of buildings on campus, and they are scattered all over the place with no layout whatsoever (and I really, really hate when buildings are just tossed around). There was a giant parking garage in the MIDDLE of campus. Campus had a McDonald’s. No one was studying; lots of preppy girls and more than one BMW with a student parking pass. The dorms are smaller than any dorms I have ever seen (including the University of Pittsburgh!). I have no idea where all six thousand undergrads eat, sleep, play, and study. The Communications department is in a double wide trailer. Buildings, except for those on the quad, are very run-down. Major building on campus is under construction with NO PLANS for completion! Gross! And it was my second choice.</p>
<p>UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - Didn’t love it, but I liked it. It was a little more helter-skelter than I’d like, and I don’t like the “campus divide” between upper and lower campus. Loved Oakland. The Park was nice as well, but I’m not a green space kind of person and could have lived without it. The Towers had small dorms, but they were considerably larger than AU’s and were at least well-located and community-inspiring. I would be in the honors dorms. It seemed much louder than GW. I’m guessing that’s because there are more cars, as the public transportation in Pittsburgh is no where near as good as in DC. All in all, a better safety than I could have asked for.</p>
<p>SCRIPPS COLLEGE - It might be great, but it’s the complete opposite of what I want in a college. The smallness killed me, as did the tampons and diva cups at the counter in the coffee house and the rainbow-painted vaginae scattered throughout campus. The dining hall was pretty suffocating. I liked the consortium.</p>
<p>WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS - This school is amazing. It’s literally… amazing. The campus is closed and cohesive, yet has TWO metro stops on campus. The green is nice, whatever, not my thing, but I loved seeing the students out, chilling, playing, studying, and practicing - the students at WashU make it the best. They are so involved. Like the South 40. All of the buildings have the same architecture, but the architecture is different for different portions of campus. Not the least bit preppy (very together and casual, with plenty of sub-cultures). First choice before, first choice by a mile after.</p>