When we were looking at colleges for my oldest (D20), I was very put off when we went to colleges that had massive ranges in dorm room styles/prices as well as meal plan price ranges. Those institutions were making choices I fundamentally didn’t agree with and did not want to support.
I thought then (and still do) that having dorm rooms available at (for example) $7k a year for the cheapest and ~$17k per year at the most expensive really just highlighted the income inequality baked into the residential experience that wealthy vs. non-wealthy students would have at those universities. A single room triple with communal bathroom at the lowest end (usually) vs. apartment style suite living with private bathrooms and sometimes even private laundry facilities.
Same thing with the meal plans. I’ve heard all the arguments for allowing students who eat a lot (athletes, boys, etc) and those who eat very little (usually young women in the examples I’ve seen) getting to tailor their plan and therefore their spending as if that is purely positive. It also assumes that those who eat substantially more have the resources to purchase the largest meal plans which is patently untrue. I also know from both personal experience and research done that many low-income students struggle with hunger on college campuses and often then make meal plan choices not based on how much that student needs to eat, but by how much they might be able to save by skimping on their meal plan.
We as a family didn’t want to support that type of system. So, one of the things we look for were schools that charged the same rates for dorm room, regardless of which dorm you were assigned and had meal plans that cost the same no matter what plan flexibility a student chose.
We ended up with a good selection of schools that do charge the same rate for also all rooms (singles were always just a bit more per year - between $500-$1k usually), and meal plans were standardized in terms of cost…the difference within the plans being how much flex money was available vs. meal swipes.
Those schools (no coincidentally imo) also were very good at having more racial and SES diversity; they usually had the highest percentage of Pell grant recipients, first generation students as well as higher levels of URM students.
My daughter ended up in one of the oldest dorms, tiny double occupancy room with built-in furniture without A/C, communal bathroom down the hall with the dreaded shower curtain separators between shower heads her first year. And paid the same amount as those students in the LEED certified newer dorms with A/C, cute lounge areas and better location. Every student paid the same amount to live in doubles. This year, she has a great space in a language suite (having applied for that spot and agreed to live in an immersion experience with multiple language obligations weekly), much better location, same price as everyone else on campus, including those living in her old dorm.
I think there are a lot of ways to discern the values and focus at colleges and universities and then vote with your applications and ultimate deposit of which kind of school you want to attend. Housing and meal plans are an important one for our family.