<p>... self explanatory.
Just wondering. :)</p>
<p>The admissions offices are totally separate, first of all. And, Columbia is obviously more selective. You shouldn't read anything into your Barnard admission vis-a-vis Columbia. But, congrats on Barnard.</p>
<p>lol what about chances for Barnard rejects? Yeah I know.</p>
<p>haha...i'm with you there, bars.</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>
[quote]
lol what about chances for Barnard rejects? Yeah I know.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>0%..........</p>
<p>Wait, are you saying that if you were rejected from Barnard that there is no way that you are getting into Columbia?</p>
<p>That is correct.</p>
<p>Well Columbia2002, I would like to prove you wrong. You are looking at (and by looking at I mean speaking to) a full fledged Barnard reject who was merely waitlisted at Columbia. Also a friend of mine was waitlisted at Barnard and got into Columbia (after deferral from ED). So there. But out of my grade (50 people) 13 applied and they only accepted 2, so its just a different ball game.</p>
<p>im in at barnard...but when i visited it kinda seemed like the school for girls who want to go to columbia but didnt get in. </p>
<p>except for the writing program.</p>
<p>Yeah I didn't apply to Barnard, I was just wondering for a friend who got in. </p>
<p>She got into Columbia :)</p>
<p>Columbia2002, don't be dumb. My friend got waitlisted by Barnard and accepted by Columbia College.</p>
<p>aaaanything can happen, it's such a crapshoot, as everyone always sayw.</p>