<p>Ha! Well I should see you in class then. I'll be the guy with the navy uniform on taking notes on my new Tablet. </p>
<p>Oh and I personally liked 100 a lot though I know some people don't feel the same way. (I know I didn't like 101; as you probably know it all depends on the professor.)</p>
<p>
[quote]
and think you're some kind of Satanist...
[/quote]
Present tense. :)</p>
<p>SirGecko, BME248 does sound really fun based on the course description, you'll have to tell us how it is throughout the semester. NavalSci 132 sounds really fun too... too bad I'm not NROTC.</p>
<p>SBR, I think I'm in your 100 class, unless there are 2?</p>
<p>feikuai, your schedule looks good. What are you majoring in? The only problem I see with your schedule is getting from Friedl to Griffith on time on MW, but since Econ51 LEC is one of the biggest, no one will care if you walk in late, or don't walk in at all.</p>
<p>Also that House course in Keohane that goes until 8:30 might be a pain because buses stop running frequently after 6, so you have to learn the bus schedule beforehand and afterwards to not be waiting a long time.</p>
<p>Yeh the subject material for 248 seems like it should be pretty cool but I am slightly worried about the professor. (though he could be great in this class, I dunno) And did you know you can take NavalSci classes if you aren't in NROTC? It won't help you to much to fulfill requirements as an engineer but I know I've had a couple of civilians in most of my more interesting classes. (like the Weapons Systems class usually has a few non ROTC people and I had one in my Naval History class) </p>
<p>Oh and I love how we are discussing upper level BME classes in the 2012 forum. Quite silly! :-P</p>