<p>My school is a little different… I mean, my school is pretty split…we have about a third of the students who have decent grades, about 1/5 honor roll and then about 1/5 with B’s and C’s.</p>
<p>The other 3/5 are failure students who barely scrape by with D’s, low C’s, and the occasional B. </p>
<p>No idea what the average SAT score is, but most of the people I know (being most of the honor roll students) have SAT’s in the 1700’s. I have an 1850 as of today. </p>
<p>So, we’re above average for the most part, but not anything special. </p>
<p>I’m inclined to chalk this up to our instruction. Being very uncompetitive for the most part, we’re not really groomed to do well. There are no SAT prep classes, no study groups, no constant score comparison, no kids cramming in the library. </p>
<p>My school is pretty standard. We have very few AP classes, no honors, no IB, and a couple of Dual Enrollments. My teachers teach the standardized state tests (save for the AP teachers, who teach the AP tests).</p>
<p>There is a severe lack of college prep and hype in my school…-sigh- I sometimes wish I had more enthusiastic college-bound kids in my school…it’s all “oh, I’m applying here and here -shrug-” or “I got in here.” No…“WOOH, I applied to 10 places and got into them all!!!” or “I’m hoping for a 25k scholarship, but since I’m OOS it’s kind of hard and…”</p>
<p>Just…“I’m going to college” End of story…</p>
<p>My school is boring… ;__;</p>
<p>EDIT: I didn’t answer your other question. -sweat- Um, well…it’ll probably say there’s no SAT/ACT emphasis there. The SAT/ACT concepts are slightly different from the norm and it takes a certain technique (test-taking skills, logic skills, analytical skills) specific to the tests themselves. </p>
<p>Nothing I do daily in school evokes any skill I use on the SAT…at least from my point of view. So, maybe adcoms come to a similar conclusion? </p>
<p>Dunno; Can’t really say for sure since I really don’t know much about the inner workings of the adcoms.</p>