<p>Can someone provide a good definition of a "competitive" vs. a "non-competitive" high school. I see the terminology on the forums and was wondering if there are certain factors which make a HS one or the other such as number of AP classes offered, etc. Thanks!</p>
<p>Typically, "competitive" high schools have a high percentage of graduates who go to 4-year colleges; a number who go to "elite" or "first tier" colleges; multiple National Merit semifinalists and commendeds; and have high participation and average scores on standardized tests (SAT and ACT)</p>
<p>We've had both kinds. </p>
<p>Competitive: parents arrive early at band concerts, save many seats with coats, go into the lobby to engage with other parents, leave after their child's portion is done so the last group playing has few in the audience.</p>
<p>Non-Competitive: parents arrive just in time, have beer on their breath, stay for the entire performance and tell every kid, "You did great."</p>
<p>Each has its advantages.</p>
<p>Paying3 - LOL - what if the parents arrive early save seats but stay for the whole thing, then stand in the lobby talking?</p>
<p>Our staff describes our high school as "comprehensive" we have aspects of both kinds of schools within the school. Nearly everyone goes to college, most to four year schools, half or more to SUNYs or CUNYs, but the contingent going to the "top" schools is relatively small. There's never more than a handful of NM finalists (none this year), but at least a couple of dozen commended and National Achievement or Hispanic scholars. Our SAT scores are a bit over state average.</p>
<p>Paying3tuitions:
I love you post!
We switched from competitive to non-competitive (as per your post) and kids are thriving!</p>