<p>People who apply early decision do so because they are most interested in that specific college.</p>
<p>For Cornell, although there is a higher percent of early decision admission, is that statistic only high because there are fewer, more qualified applicants for early decision? </p>
<p>COULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO HAVE A LOWER CHANCE OF GETTING IN WITH EARLY DECISION? Read the following conditions:</p>
<p>Conditions:</p>
<li><p>Does Cornell consider the ED applicants to be one pool for which there is a predetermined amount of available spots? And then the RD applicants are another pool for which there is a predetermined amount of available spots?</p></li>
<li><p>Are people who generally apply ED SIMPLY those who are very interested in the school, or are they doing it because they feel they are STRONGER contenders for admission than those who would apply RD?</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Ex. Lets say Cornell allots 400 spots for the early decision applicants, and they allot 1000 spots for RD.</p>
<p>(Using more extreme examples)</p>
<p>Applicant A is 100% qualified to get into Cornell, and he applies ED.
However, 400 other applicants (Applicants B,C,D, etc.) are also all applying ED. These applicants are all even BETTER than applicant A. (Iff Condition 2 is true, which says those who apply early decision are generally stronger competitors) </p>
<p>When Cornell Admissions compares applicant A to the other 400 applicants, they will see that A is not as good as the other applicants are, and A will not be given any one of the 400 spots. However, the ED pool will have a 400/401 admission %. Of course in real life much more than the maximum number accepted would apply, but this extreme example goes to show how ED can have a 99% acceptance rate, but only because all people who applied ED are so overqualified already and they themselves know it.</p>
<p>Instead, lets pretend the same applicant A applies regular decision. Pretend 2000 other people are applying. Now, of these 2000, only 199 are better than A, 1000 are worse, and 800 are equal. Therefore, the 1000 who are worse will be denied, and we are left with 199 better than A, 800 equal to A, and applicant A himself all being admitted. So now, statistically, there is a 50% chance of admittance, even though it is actually easier because the other people who apply are not as qualified as those who apply ED.</p>
<p>So basically, the same person (applicant A got in with RD rather than ED)</p>
<p>REMEMBER: THIS WILL ONLY BE TRUE IF CONDITIONS 1 AND 2 PRESENTED AT THE TOP ARE TRUE FOR CORNELL (OTHER OTHER COLLEGES)</p>
<p>SO…</p>
<p>… if anyone can verifiy whether or not Cornell uses seperate pools with a PREDETERMINED AMOUNT OF SPOTS for ED and RD, and if those who apply ED are all generally stronger applicants than RD, that would be greatly appreciated.</p>