Courses undergradutes should take in pursuing patent law

<p>I'm currently a second year undergraduate pursuing a degree in Biochemistry and am looking to apply to law schools and study patent law. It's hard to find people around me who can give me advice as to courses I should take as someone with these goals.</p>

<p>I saw micro/macroeconomics under "Legal Studies" section of my school's course listings, and realized I had no knowledge of econ whatsoever. Is it important to take these courses? Or should I take other courses like those concerned with health law and things like that?</p>

<p>For patent law, you dont need any economics course. However, you do need to finish your science degree first as it is required for patent law. What you Have in your science degree gets you credibility in your field for patent law. Economics is irrelevant. LSAT is the most important of all when getting into Law school. Just keep your GPA up, get good LSAT marks and do some ECs related to law and you would do fine.</p>

<p>Not specific to patent law, but the from the ABA’s page on undergrad preparation for law school
[Pre-Law</a> | Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar](<a href=“http://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_education/resources/pre_law.html]Pre-Law”>http://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_education/resources/pre_law.html)</p>

<p>Some of the types of knowledge that would maximize your ability to benefit from a legal education include:</p>

<ul>
<li>A broad understanding of history, including the various factors (social, political, economic, and cultural) that have influenced the development of our society in the United States.</li>
<li>A fundamental understanding of political thought and of the contemporary American political system.</li>
<li>Some basic mathematical and financial skills, such as an understanding of basic pre-calculus mathematics and an ability to analyze financial data.</li>
<li>A basic understanding of human behavior and social interaction.</li>
<li>An understanding of diverse cultures within and beyond the United States, of international institutions and issues, of world events, and of the increasing interdependence of the nations and communities within our world.</li>
</ul>

<p>I would recommend taking basic micro/macro econ classes to almost any undergrad student, including those planning for law school, although it certainly isn’t necessary.</p>

<p>Any classes that are reading & writing heavy are also recommended.</p>

<p>There is a multi-year long thread about patent law “Overview of patent law …” Read it.</p>

<p>I am a patent attorney and have been practicing exclusively in the field for over 28 years. To be a patent attorney you do not need economics, micro- or macro-. You do not need to have taken courses in history, math, human behavior, social interaction, or diverse cultures around the world.</p>

<p>You WILL need a great deal of education in your chosen field of science. You do not NEED a MS or PhD, just the basics that will enable you to understand the new scientific developments in the field. However, you may lose out on a job prospect to someone with a higher degree than yours.</p>

<p>As for me, I did not know that I wanted to be a lawyer when I started college, but I liked science, so I was a science major in college. I switched majors in college and in the process of searching for the appropriate new major I ended up taking courses in many scientific fields. Near the end of college, I had no idea what to do with my science education, so I went to law school. At the end of law school, there was a recession, and I could not get a job, so I went back to school and got a master’s degree in a science field, thereafter, jobs were a plenty for me.</p>

<p>My general scientific education has helped me immensely in my patent lawyer career. It has helped me do patent application work and patent litigation work. Virtually all of my work as a patent lawyer is completely different scientifically that what I learned in college, but in college I learned the scientific basics which enabled me to understand the small improvements that are the stuff of patents. That education also made me not to fear any of the scientific issues that have come up in my work. I knw that with some effort, I will be able to understand them.</p>

<p>Although one does not “need” any particular education beyond science to be a good patent lawyer, it’s a good idea to learn in college as much as you can in as many fields as you can. For example, because I took an accounting course in college (really boring), dealing with accounting issues in a patent litigation is not a daunting task for me. Also, because of my broad general non-science education, I have enough knowledge of other things so that I do not look like an idiot to clients and others. And the most important thing to learn besides the science if one wants to be a patent lawyer is to learn how to express yourself in writing and orally. If you can’t do that, you will never get anywhere in the business.</p>

<p>Years ago in the small trade school that I attended for college, the school’s management began talking to alumni engineers and learned that alumni were dead-ended in their corporate jobs in technical positions, not rising to upper level management. Instead, alumni of that other college up river leap frogged over the techies and became the upper level managers. So my trade school determined that the distribution requirements at the school had to change to include courses in writing and speaking. Things have improved for alumni. The moral is, learn to write and speak so that people understand what you are trying to say, and this advice holds whether you end up as a lawyer or an engineer. You don’t want to take writing courses when you are 40 years old.</p>

<p>I agree with Concerneddad that one does not NEED a graduate degree in a science to be able to practice patent law, and also that, unfortunately, employers can hire new patent lawyers with advanced degrees, so they do so in preference to those having only a bachelor’s degree.</p>

<p>As far as non-scientific undergraduate courses, the only one I would specifically recommend would be a course in general business law, to give you an idea of legal thinking and a little of the basics that you may encounter if you wind up working for a corporate employer. Other than that (and even that’s not necessary), take whatever interests you and that you can do well in to get your GPA up there (otherwise you might not even get into a law school).</p>

<p>With just an undergraduate degree in biochemistry it is extremely unlikely you will be able to prosecute (write) patents in the field. It is a complex area which includes much of biotechnology and pharma. All the patent agents I know are PhDs. </p>

<p>If I were you I would focus on computer science. There is currently a huge shortage of trained patent attorneys in software and there is little benefit of having an advanced degree. Chemical engineering is also a busy patent field and a bachelor’s degree is usually sufficient.</p>

<p>Perhaps some engineering courses too.</p>