Critical Reading December 2008 Test Version 2: Korean Mother, Nature, etc.

<p>earthly landmarks in navigation question?
i said needing to orient themselves on the seas
the one with the almanac i dont think works b/c the almanac isnt introduced until later</p>

<p>^thats what I put</p>

<p>sometimes the answers is further in the passage even if they are quoted</p>

<p>cuz they can already use the northstar and other space objects for navigating it said... u could be right though... all i know is that in the next paragraph it definitly brought up almanac</p>

<p>The answer to the OMINOUS/morbid question was OMINOUS. OMINOUS simply means threatening, and morbid relates to death. that passage never even mentioned anything morbid</p>

<p>good thats what i put... lets adress two things
1. what was the actually question of the avant grand
2. what was the answer to the navigating... almanac or sky one??</p>

<p>For the overseas empire ? about the longitude/langitude and empires, the author didn't discuss DEFENDING anything..you would have to make a huge assumption that they were defending their lands and this assumption does not work on the CR... so the answer was explicit, that they were navigating the lands, to emphasize the scope of their explorations in order to make the point that the compass was needed.</p>

<p>avant-grande? the filmmakes one? that one confounded me. and the answer was...errr...something and commonplace.... i 'm 80% sure of that one, although the other choice did make sense, but not in that exact context.</p>

<p>what almanac/ sky question? too vague. gve us more information</p>

<p>1, u remember the actual question of avant grande?
2, i dont remember navigating being an answer choice?
3, it was the question on the top right of the page with almanac as an answer choice</p>

<p>you didn't elucidate on the question...top right..i dont remember that at all.</p>

<p>and no, how does somebody actually remmeber the exact wording of the question?</p>

<p>navigating was not the answer choice word for word. maybe we are not on the same page here.</p>

<p>my bad... it seems paradoxical that commonplace is an answer since the filmer was an unconventional avant grand. unorthodox seems to make sense</p>

<p>okay. did some research.,</p>

<p>on MSN dictionary</p>

<p>the definition of unconventional</p>

<p>not part of the established or conventional mainstream of something such as the movie industry, theater, or medicine </p>

<p>this definition seemed to match more.</p>

<p>unorthodox= typically applied to a religion</p>

<p>unorthodox is ussually used in reference to religon but its not limited to it. i use it all the time discribing other stuff</p>

<p>but in this case unconventional is associated with the avant garde. what was the 2nd blank next to "unorthodox"?</p>

<p>just please explain how commonplace makes sense in discribing a avant grand unconventional film</p>

<p>logical proof of the experimental;
<a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/610813-logical-proof-test2-s-korean-mothers-experimental-about-cows.html#post1061403712%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/610813-logical-proof-test2-s-korean-mothers-experimental-about-cows.html#post1061403712&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>accomadate, then unorthodox</p>

<p>the choice was..."unconventional...commonplace"</p>

<p>If I recall correctly, the SECOND part of that sentence had a "reverse direction" to the first. the first part described the "grand unconventional film" and the second part contradicted it. i do remember the two choices were supposed to be OPPOSITE in meaning.</p>

<p>maybe i read the question wrong.. u sure?</p>

<p>well depending on the sentence itself, i think you may be describing it wrong dude, so chill for now until someone can remember the wording</p>