<p>@thishere
I was a sophomore when I made this more than a year ago. I am entering junior spring now. I have had more Stern classes than I would like to remember, haha. The curve sucks. Plain and simple. Sometimes you get royally shafted by it. Rarely will it help you out. A couple examples to quantify:
- friend gets a 98 on his micro final in sophomore fall. Average was so high that he only got a B+ overall
- I get a 94% cumulative in a core course, but the class was such b.s. and so watered-down that almost everyone else did nearly as well; so, regardless of the mean, the standard deviation meant that I got an A-
- the spring micro is significantly harder than fall micro. Average on our final was 61; if you got over a 69, you got an A</p>
<p>You can see that sometimes it helps you like the last case where the material is so hard you don’t even have to worry about getting it all right, you just want to get more right than 75-85% of the class so you can get an A- or A. Most of the time, though, it’s the opposite. Too many people do well, so the minutest difference can be the difference between a 4.0 or a 3.3 for the class.</p>
<p>The problem is when the teacher lets the curve do the differentiating, which to me is a complete cop-out. If you are giving students who scored in the 90s Bs, you are lazy and bad at making tests. One of my favorite professors was much more realistic about it. He made brutally hard exams, but he was incredibly honest and said, “I’d much rather have the difference between an A and an A- be something like 6-8 points, I hate the scenario where you get one question wrong and you’re screwed for the entire semester.” Fairest guy I’ve ever met.</p>
<p>The curve being what it is, there isn’t much collaboration at Stern. Most kids make a pretty tight friend circle and won’t venture outside of that when it comes to crunch time. That is why people join AKPsi and BAP and DSP because they (informally) keep practice exams and homework solutions from every class and pass it down each year. The kids outside the business societies tend to just get together and tank every assignment or exam.</p>
<p>In my experience it lightens up as you reach upperclassman years. A lot of kids know each other really well by that point and are more willing to casually help each other out, but it’s still a very tense atmosphere around exam time.</p>
<p>There is a complete mix of people here. You have the Asian kids who literally wheel in a carry-on bag with clothes, a pillow, and their schoolbooks and stay downstairs in Stern for 3 days. You have the ones who start studying for exams the week before and are there past midnight six nights in a row. You have the ones who sit down with Red Bull the night before and crank out the entire semester’s material in one marathon session. You have the fratstars who are TFTC and wing it.</p>
<p>There is no “college life” here, at least as you’re thinking of it. Greeklife is a very strange beast here. There are no dorm parties, it’s impossible not to get broken up by the RAs or FFIRs. Clubbing is hard your first two years unless you have an ID. It’s a very different college experience than most people picture in their heads. I think that’s why a lot of kids in Stern are the way they are. They realize there’s not much going on for them outside of Stern so they choose to excel at what’s in front of them. Personally, I’ve always found more than enough to distract me and my grades probably reflect that to some extent, haha.</p>