<p>I am head-over-heels, tripping-over-myself smitten with Cornell (CALS, in particular). If Cornell was a woman, I would go gay for her. However, my mother (a veterinarian who visits the Veterinary Medicine post-grad school often for conferences and the like) insists that the atmosphere is extremely dog-eat-dog, and that it's not unusual for students to sabotage one another in order to get ahead.</p>
<p>Is there any truth to that? I know that every Ivy League comes with competitiveness, but is it noticeably worse at Cornell? (not that that would stop me from applying, but I'd like to hear from current students)</p>
<p>my interviewer told me it’s the most competitive of the ivies. however, he also said that such competition is not such a bad thing. coming out of cornell, so he says, you will dominate the job market and graduate school because you are better than others at competition and getting things done</p>
<p>I don’t know where people get this notion that Cornell’s cut-throat. I have not seen any sabotaging. The cut-throat are a very small minority. ^^Cut-wrist definitely reflects the general atmosphere more accurately : P</p>
<p>If intense competition exists at Cornell, it would most likely be present in only a few specific schools or programs as opposed to being university wide.</p>
<p>can an engineering student comment on the cut-throat nature of the school. i was hoping to be done with the competing and starting the collaboration part of my life.</p>
<p>Yeah, the engineers I know always seem to work together on problem sets. The work can be difficult, but it seems like engineers work together to get everything done. I don’t know of any engineers sabotaging each other.</p>