<p>Did anyone have the test with section 2 being the math section with those crazy grid in probs (telephone, tri factor thingy, and something else..). I'm guessing that's not experimental b/c I think everyone had it, but can anyone hopefully prove me wrong??? I left 3 gridins blank on that one.</p>
<p>bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bumpb ubmpbbmbpbmpabubmpbmpbbubmpbubbmbpbmpbmpbpmbpmpbubbuupmubpumpmupmbpmbpumumupmbpumbupm</p>
<p>Look at the other threads and deduce for yourself.</p>
<p>I had two grid-in section, the first in section 2 and the later in section 4 or 5 or 6 (somewhere in that range). I do remember the tri-factor question.</p>
<p>i had that section!! those questiosn were kinda hard...tri factorial scared me, telephone didnt, and some other ones were complicated!! omg the consectuive number one scared me, the one where ur consiectuive number has to be less than 1000...buti think i got it right</p>
<p>well to answer the question about consectuive numbers, i basically put in the calculator: x + (x+2) + (x+3). then i went to the table and found out there were 9 numbers. piece of cake.</p>
<p>if everyone didn't have that section, does that mean it was experimental?</p>
<p>yes, but unfrotunately for you..everyone did have it</p>
<p>i don't think so tho, some ppl told me they didn't have those...</p>