<p>Photographic memory you say? I used the same book. :p</p>
<p>If only I had fared the same on WH.</p>
<p>barron's was somewhat insufficient</p>
<p>hey what did u guys get for the sagebrush and the red soil/chalk experiment</p>
<p>and do u guys remember the limestone water and seed experiment??</p>
<p>Fair enough. But if I'm not mistaken, I think everything on the test was actually somewhere in the book except for one biome question (I took molecular btw). I'd say that's astounding. :)</p>
<p>huge x2 on the sagebrush +trees+differing soils
i just remember narrowing down and guessing. dont remember questions. actually i put that the trees occupied a narrow niche... ?... trying to think of more</p>
<p>i narrowed down to amino acid and protein sequence and just guessed... think i but protein, lame.</p>
<p>the cross-section of the root was one of the worst ones i could've been asked to identify. neither pr or sn had as detailed of a diagram as the test's</p>
<p>"hey don't worry</p>
<p>i found it medium-hard. and I have a photographic memory. I literally memorized barron's"
well that's consoling</p>
<p>wha? syrius you used the same book? what book?</p>
<p>^ Barron's prep book for SAT II Biology. I think it's the most recent edition.</p>
<p>why is there no quoting here. :(</p>
<p>uhmmm another question was like for the two of the circular dna
was that bacteria or retroviruses??</p>
<p>bacteria..</p>
<p>^ Awesome, if that's truly the answer.</p>
<p>funny i used the barrons book too and the questions on the test didn't show up in there. Did you use the red one?</p>
<p>Ya, it's red and white.</p>
<p>I didn't actually have time to take any of the practice tests if that's what you meant (besides the quizzes after each chapter). I'm referring specifically to the information in the review.</p>
<p>did you solely use the Barron's book for prep or did you combine it with others? I preped using Cliff's AP. </p>
<p>the first girl i spoke to after the test said that it was a piece of cake. that broke me entirely.</p>
<p>Just Barron's. It was so well organized in contrast to my WH prep book. Props to the teacher that wrote it.</p>
<p>I think you'll do fine. The curve, like most of the subject tests, is pretty lenient (or so I hear).</p>
<p>i highly doubt i'll be in the range of 700s. cheers to all of you who did well though. really amazed!</p>
<p>Hmmm... I took Bio-M, but I think I might have grided in Bio-E for code thinking back? W.T.F. should I do?</p>
<p>Is that gonna be a problem?</p>
<p>i took biology the school year before last school year and environmental sci last year
i read the sparknotes guide and took 2/3 practice tests, then read PR and took both practice tests. pretty much crammed everything into the last 2 weeks. ideally i would've taken the last sparknotes practice test and lightly skim both books. however, I don't I would've gained more than 20-30 additional points</p>
<p>what did you guys get for the sagebrush +trees+differing soils and the allele questions?</p>
<p>i think that is a big problem in relation to the marking of the answers for the M section using the E-code :S</p>
<p>"wrong, i'm sorry, i just checked and it was prophase I, exactly what I put!!!!!! "</p>
<p>dude, bigweight, you scared me for a second. the kaplan book couldn't possibly lie to me twice!</p>
<p>I know that I wrote Bio-M under name, but I know CB doesn't use OCR. I'm really not 100% sure either way. Darn.</p>
<p>your best option will be to call them up and find out. hopefully it works out</p>