DECEMBER 2011 SAT Pre/Post Test Discussion

Test Preparation SAT Preparation
141

<p>Nutrition only I was true cuz 3 the total grams would have been (16) x 288, not watever was ooption 3. ANd the 2nd option was clearly off. So it was just I</p>

142

<p>muck was practical as well as useful, since it removed the scent</p>

143

<p>guys do u think -1 will be 770 this time?</p>

144

<p>what was the second option(II) for the nutrition label? im pretty sure it was I only.</p>

145

<p>Oh yeah for the nutrition, the II one was about the grams of fat. And you had to multiple the number of fat by the servings which was like 16 grams and 28 servings so II was wrong</p>

146

<p>@concretepencil94: I’d appreciate in the future if you could explain an answer without insulting those of us who might have made a silly error. </p>

<p>I still stand by my answer as I can’t remember the full question. :/</p>

147

<p>It said 80 calories which I’m guessing includes the 35 calories from fats… A calorie is a calorie isn’t it?</p>

148

<p>maybe i don’t remember II… if it was really obvious I think i would pick up on it. oh well.</p>

149

<p>Nutrition was “I only”
III could have worked, but it wasn’t right for the particular package and the instructions stated “must be true”.
:)</p>

<p>I had some trouble with a few grid ins and the first math section was rough. Other than that I felt good about math.</p>

150

<p>Can we each branch off into subjects? This forum is getting confusing.</p>

<p>Writing: <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1251973-sat-writing-thread.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1251973-sat-writing-thread.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Reading: <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1251971-sat-critical-reading-thread.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1251971-sat-critical-reading-thread.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Math: <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1251972-sat-math-thread.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/1251972-sat-math-thread.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

151

<p>wasnt II fat from calorie was 40% or less?</p>

<p>i thought it was 35/(80+35)… so its less than 40%.</p>

152

<p>thats a better idea.</p>

153

<p>Yeah I put “I only” too.
II was like fewer than 40% of the calories are from fat blah blah
and the calories from that fat was 35 which is larger than 40% of the total calories(80)</p>

154

<p>You need more experience with labels.
The 80 includes the calories from fat.</p>

155

<p>… is that for real</p>

156

<p>So what do you say the answer is tjhssKid21?</p>

157

<p>It was “I only”</p>

<p>b/c number III was the calories count of 80, not the weight or whatever.</p>

158

<p>What did you get for the math one with the annual fees? I got m+4d</p>

159

<p>I thought all the math sections were pretty easy and but I had only problem with the 2nd CR section that I took.</p>

160

<p>m + 3d.</p>

<p>.</p>