Deterioration of UCLA

<p>ill quickly sum up what you said kaeihanna:</p>

<p>Berkeley owns UCLA, and the stats prove it.</p>

<p>Berkeley +UCLA >>Harvard+Stanford.</p>

<p>lol I don’t think so</p>

<p>keihanna, keep dreaming. I don’t think that statement will ever be true :(</p>

<p>Son No.1 chose UCLA over Stanford. (wife and I are Stanford Alums.)<br>
went to UCLA Law now at BigLaw (top 50)</p>

<p>Son No2. Waitlisted Stanford Went to Caltech.</p>

<p>D didn’t apply stanford. Chose Berkeley over Pomona
(currently Study at UK)</p>

<p>UCLA is a good school.</p>

<p>Bye</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I lol’ed</p>

<p>(10 char)</p>

<p>I just find it funny how you’re trying so hard to defend UCLA’s “reputation” as a Stanford alum.Take a chill pill. I think you take things too seriously.</p>

<p>Bye. </p>

<p>lol</p>

<p>Of course, my son went to UCLA. He just wanted to prove that he was smart enough to get in Stanford but he didn’t want to be like his parents.</p>

<p>He loved UCLA. *( he got in Berkeley, Stanford, Duke and NW)</p>

<p>Resurrection!!!</p>

<p>I don’t really care about UCLA’s reputation anymore. I just can’t wait to get my diploma and get out of Los Angeles.</p>

<p>ucla111, I’ve been seeing you all around the UCLA forums. sucks to be you dude. What’s your major and what year are you?</p>