Hi everyone,
I’ve been trying to practice telling my story and portraying myself in the best possible light (not necessarily done below, as I’m trying to understand the situation above all else), so I thought it would be really helpful to engage in a discussion about my application and why I am weaker than most applicants.
Info:
Straight As through everything, 33 ACT, two subject tests in fall, recs should be pretty good considering I’m doing online school, Canadian full pay, family history should help me out quite a bit, six years and a summer to finish school (first three years were really bad for me, only completed grade 9 p/f), full APs for senior year, almost full APs for junior year, in summer school right now, no APs before junior year.
Background:
Almost six years ago, I started grade 9 with my mom and my brother. We did homeschooling, which consisted of four core pass-or-fail classes that my mom would teach us. It quickly fell apart. We only did like 20 minutes of course work a day and it took me two years just to finish my grade 9 courses. I did another 5 months (grade 10) but didn’t get far and decided to pretty much give up. It wasn’t working. I was either spending all my days at home playing video games or at my lake having a good time-- academics were nonexistent. Spring came around and I was feeling pretty bummed out. I felt like my potential was extremely high, yet I was about to drop out. After some talks with my dad, I tentatively-- I say tentatively because our expectations were so low that we weren’t too confident-- decided to start up school again, but this time I would be entirely in control and everything would be through an online accredited school in America. Despite having to do another three years (six total) of high school all by myself, I started to excel. I got straight As, I enjoyed myself, and I stayed on top of my courses even when we traveled. I kept this same pattern going to this day, always pushing myself harder and harder.
I work every day at my cottage in northern Canada, hoping to wake up early enough to finish school before everyone is ready to have some fun.
Why I (kind of) think that I have a chance at top schools:
this is going to sound really arrogant. I apologize. It’s not my intention and I have incredible respect for all other applicants. However, I think candor is the best approach here.
I’m genuinely having troubles understanding why my application is considered worse than a lot of applicants. I know it is-- almost everyone has told me that, but I can’t quite figure out why. From my point of view, I see my stats in the context of my environment and am really proud when compared to other applicant’s stats in their context. I had no expectations apart from “dropout.” I had to work at a lake or on vacation where the last thing I wanted to do was school. I had no accountability, meaning I could have fallen extremely behind. I had to work when everyone around me was waking up at noon and sitting around watching TV or playing outside all day. I don’t understand how someone can look at stats and not see the advantage (I think) I have. Literally, nobody from a few years ago (including myself) would believe it if you told them I would be in a position to apply to a top school.
My parents didn’t really care if I dropped out and lived off of them and their money-- in fact, they expected it. After doing three years of failing, I could have said “screw it” and went boating all day every day at my lake. I could have taken the easiest courses, which would have taken me only an hour per day to complete. I could have not taken the ACT and go to my local college. But I didn’t. I decided to push myself as far as possible for no real reason apart from personal goals. These choices I made were not encouraged by anyone or anything apart from my drive to succeed. I was so incredibly alone in the process and made myself from a dropout to an applicant at Brown-- I feel like that is worth something.
Tl;dr: Who would you want running your business, a trust fund kid who took over their parents’ billion dollar company and managed it well, or a kid who started their own million dollar company from the ground up. An argument could probably be made for either, and it is a poor analogy with plenty of false-equivalencies, but I think you get my point: context changes everything. I think a lot of other applicants are incredible and I really respect them, but I’m having troubles understanding how I’m at a disadvantage when the context is taken into consideration.
ECs:
This is where I can understand my application can fall slightly behind. But, I would ask you to name any trait that a person will have demonstrated through an EC and I can try to make an argument for how I’ve done the same.
I have done a lot of stuff like put in and take out four docks and boat lifts in 50-degree water for three elderly neighbors every year since I was 5. Lakelife for me, living at a shared cottage with five other families (very rarely all they all up at the same time), has taught me so many incredible life skills. There is a lot of work to go around: tarping and caring for boats; getting gas; cleaning up top-to-bottom every time we leave, so like once every two weeks; getting a ton of groceries and packing up to road trip up to the lake every few weeks; etc. I also chop down small trees in the village and sell the wood as a small job. I’m looking for more ECs to do this summer.
Schools:
Brown (behavioral decision sciences), Stanford (symbolic systems or product design), Dartmouth (econ or cs), USC (Marshall), Northeastern (business or something), Amherst (psych and econ), Tufts, Babson(ED?). If I don’t get into one of those I’ll just go to one in Canada.
Tl;dr: Similar stats but no conventional ECs that most applicants have. I think that my personal context of doing everything by myself and transforming myself from a dropout to an applicant at top schools can carry my application. I was at the bottom and made my way to the top with no accountability, no real help, and with plenty of disincentives; I think that this can boost my application because most applicants have plenty of expectations and are pushed to become Ivy-material. My lake lifestyle and sharing a cottage with my extended family can (hopefully) make for a great essay in which I can describe my character.
I think my stats, story, and essay can be better than most applicants, but I think my ECs are weaker than most. If you have any comments I would love to discuss them with you!
Thanks for reading this wall of text. Again, I am sorry if I came off really arrogant. If I dance around the issues I have, I don’t think I will achieve much from this thread
.