<p>"Oh really, then how come when I go through resumes at work it's always UT OR A&M BBA graduates, hmm? Then how come I meet just as many people with BBAs from A&M in my field (RE development) as I do people with BBAs from UT? I've met just as many well-off A&M business graduates as I have UT business graduates."</p>
<ul>
<li>No offense, but you work in the real estate development business- I know many people who don't even have a college degree that go into RE Development. Anybody with half a functioning brain can work in your field, regardless of where he or she graduates.</li>
</ul>
<p>Your logic, or EXPERIENCE, is also terrible. Frankly, it is stupid to say that you've met "just as many well-off A&M business graduates as I have UT business graduates." So are you calling the two schools equals in the alumni it produces? Maybe you need to meet more people. I think we can all agree that UT's business school is head and shoulders above Mays.</p>
<p>"Sorry, I don't buy into the "carries the same respect as a Wharton degree." No doubt that Honors at McCombs carries a lot of weight, but Wharton is in a class all by it's own."</p>
<ul>
<li>Learn how to read- I said some.</li>
</ul>
<p>"If you're going to get a business job IN Texas, it doesn't really matter which school you go to. The alumni networks are even about the same size and there's enough mutural respect between the two schools that Longhorns hire Aggies and Aggies hire Longhorns. Hell, to externally transfer to either school the only difference (from the last time I checked) is that you need calculus at UT Austin. Otherwise you pretty much have to have the same GPA and mostly the same classes in order to get into either school as a transfer student."</p>
<ul>
<li>This statement is also ridiculously biased. Six out of ten analysts from Merrill Lynch's Investment Bank in Houston are from the University of Texas at Austin. Others have come from Vanderbilt, Rice, TAMU, UVA, etc. At Lehman Brothers' Houston office, you will only find 3 Aggie investment banking analysts out of at least 15.
Maybe in your industry both degrees carry the same weight, if any at all, but in the OP's specified fields, in which he has expressed an interest in stocks, McCombs is head and shoulders above Mays. It is ludicrous and ignorant to say otherwise.</li>
</ul>
<p>"When companies recruit they are trying to fill up positions quickly; they don't really give a damn who you are personally. You can't use recruitment as a measure of long-term success."
- Oh really- why do companies do interviews at all? Goldman Sachs might as well hire based on resume alone- instead of personal attributes.</p>
<p>Clearly you either have bad information or you are an idiot. </p>
<p>"From my first-hand EXPERIENCE (which greatly outweighs your opinion), yes, with an Economics degree, you can. Just go on Google and look up people who have bachelor's degrees in Economics from UT-Austin for example. A lot of them DO work in the banking and financial industries. I've even met a few of them. Just because companies are heavily recruiting from the finance department doesn't mean you can't have just as much success with an economics degree. Those companies recruit heavily from business because it's easier for them to compare the GPAs from several business schools and know who's a better candidate because business schools are more standardized. Economics is not quite so standardized so it's harder for them to know. Some economics departments are business heavy whereas others are not."</p>
<p>-Apparently, your experience in your RE Development applies only to your industry. I suggest you keep your comments, ideas, opinions, and experience to yourself, as they seem logically flawed and absolutely ludicrous.</p>