<p>juoh, your explanation sounds pretty reasonable. That sounds like it'd mean that there was a clear distinction between the type of people separated into the two categories.</p>
<p>i got the 3rd one too....</p>
<p>perhaps "apps for wait" means waitlisted/?!?!?</p>
<p>i HOPE NOT!!!</p>
<p>Yeah thats what I thought initially, but since the key distinction between 2 and 3 seems to be the "worth the wait" phrase, juoh's explanation seems to make sense.</p>
<p>Does Berkeley even have a waitlist?</p>
<p>Anyone have one that is 000000001?</p>
<p>Maybe the "Leadership Award Alumni Scholarship" email is the first email they sent out to applicants.</p>
<p>I don't think its waitlist. They don't waitlist people who have been invited for Regents do they?</p>
<p>I think the FR_WAIT means the email that includes "we're worth the wait?" Maybe? haha..</p>
<p>Now a whole new paranoia has started with the 00003<em>Wait and 00000</em>2Unlogged emails!!!</p>
<p>^^^^seriously.</p>
<p>Leave it up to CCers to investigate a few numbers at the bottom of an e-mail. Ah well, please continue. This is fascinating me.</p>
<p>i am off to celebrate Easter. I have had enough!</p>
<p>I agree with OP that if the ads are reading this forum, they must be enjoying the analysis and learning the psychology of bored and anxious minds... Maybe it's a funded research project being done by the UCB Dept. of Psychology on effects of recruiting (or lack of) on applicants!</p>
<p>Relax, lmicheelee - the APPS<em>FR</em>WAIT could also mean tell these guys it's worth the wait.</p>
<p>Question is did anyone get any other DaVinci code at the bottom of their email - esp. those who didn't have the 'worth the wait' version and was it sent on Fri/Sat this week or much earlier than UCLA announcement..</p>
<p>Yeah, that's most probably it. But regarding #2, if it was for those who haven't logged on yet, why would #3 have instructions to log on? So it most probably means something else I guess.</p>
<p>The current presumption is that 'worth the wait' indicated that its a likely right? So if #2 doesn't have it... ahh.. :S</p>
<p>Well you have to admit, the fact that they sent different versions of the email is somewhat intriguing...</p>
<p>rr43:
haha very creative w/ the funded research project
=]</p>
<p>aii i hope tomorrow is 3/27 already</p>
<p>@Narsil - You got regents, but sorry, u r waitlisted for admission! LOL
Just kidding..</p>
<p>Cal should make a special mention of our efforts when they release their decisions.. :rolleyes:</p>
<p>@rr43, LOL! i'm expecting anything.. even a rejection wouldn't faze me now.. -_- maybe...</p>
<p>forgottenhawk, yes i have that at the bottom of my email as well...my only concern about the theory that they're "warning" UCLA admits to wait is that I DIDN'T get accepted to UCLA...</p>
<p>Narsil: agreed :P
drsarah: i don't think the UCs communicate with eachother that way</p>
<p>@dsarah - I thought one UC doesn't have access to another UC decision - only info they have access to is you applied to some other UC as that is in the global db</p>