<p>well if i were you i wouldnt talk specifics again until friday, dummy. play it on the safe side then go "qin han agh!!" as much as you want.</p>
<p>crap guys... i think i lied on the change over time... :(</p>
<p>It's ok... I think I made up a word in my compare and contrast =P If you had other evidence (that WERE true)... then I think that's ok.. But I don't know. I think I'm just saying that because I'm hoping myself they wouldn't take of points for stuff like that.</p>
<p>It would've been so much better if the COT covered a larger time span.. I had very little to say about it.</p>
<p>IN general, how many "changes" and "continuities" is acceptable?
also, if you have a wrong "continuity" how much points do you think would be taken off?
And, if this wrong "continuity" was a part of my thesis, then no point?</p>
<p>I did the Qin/Han thing too! Can't detail specifics, but I spent a paragraph on the Qin; the rest of the essay was general. Stuff started before the Qin and carried on... </p>
<p>:-/</p>
<p>Qin? That was like 300-200 B.C..... very wrong time period. 100 to 600 CE mostly dealt with Buddhism and the North-South dynasties period of disunification.</p>
<p>Of course, I wasn't too familiar with that period, so I just flooded the question with about 6 pages of Rome.</p>
<p>Yeah, as evidenced in my earlier posts... THAT QUESTION WAS DEF NOT GOOD FOR ME</p>
<p>XD</p>
<p>Oh well.</p>
<p>Likely, is so many people are making similar mistakes, the scoring guide will become less strict in reflection.</p>
<p>lets just say there was an essay abut the change over time for rome. What would you say the cultural changes were?</p>