<p>7_dust,</p>
<p>Two wrongs don't make a right. I similarly denounce Israeli acts of aggression. Don't ASSume that I'm just some flag waving Israel supporter. I'm a supporter of human decency and what I believe are human rights.</p>
<p>I also agree that Pakistan is not a terrible example of a country. But let's be honest here: The US's supporting Pakistan further strengthens and helps further entrench the military government. And don't give me this "because they're Muslim crap." ASSumptions are the start of a failed argument.</p>
<p>I agree that the Balfour Declaration was an example of a violation of rights. However, by the logic of Hamas, Native Americans should be attacking the US, Celts should be attacking England, the Ainu should be attacking Japan, and the Tibetans should be violently attacking China.</p>
<p>Violence should be the last option. Not because I'm some pansy hippie against violence, but because violence is a difficult tool to use properly. Although I can't necessarily justify Palestinian actions in Israel, their attacks have some logic attached to them. The Palestinians do not have a decent military, so they have few other choices. Attacking the IDF doesn't have the psychological effect that attacking a cafe full of civilian men, women, and children does. </p>
<p>However, while violence shows resolve, it can also paint you as an aggressor/criminal in the eyes of the international community. Since the promulgation of a state ultimately lies in the hands of the international community, playing by their rules also makes sense for the struggling insurgency. </p>
<p>But once again, don't try to paint me as the marauding anti-Muslim. I'm half Muslim, you dolt.</p>