<p>Now that everyone probably has gotten their financial aid offers, I thought a thread explaining what colleges were better/worse would be useful, especially for current juniors. I know all the colleges I applied to had fairly similar financial aid policies, but they did not have very similar offers. </p>
<p>My family is very low-income-i live with my father, who make a bit less than $20,000 per year, and my mother pays no child support but made around $20,000 last year also. We own our home and land, but it isn't worth too much. I have an older brohter in college, with basically full scholarships.</p>
<p>Financial aid as follows: I calculated the cost of the school (tuition, fees, room and board) minus all grant aid.
Amherst (where I'll be going): -1,0xx will cover all direct costs plus books, supplies and about $50. No loans.</p>
<p>Swarthmore: 5,xxx basically affordable, pretty big expectations for my earnings, both over the summer and work-study. reasonable loans.</p>
<p>Wesleyan: 5,000 pretty similar to swarthmore, but more loans/less work</p>
<p>Reed: 4,400 reasonable, combination of my earnings and loans.</p>
<p>Oberlin: 10,xxx HUGE loans, merit award i hadn't expected didn't help much </p>
<p>Colgate: 1,xxx small loan, not too much work (i think it would have been more loans, but I was an Alumni Memorial Scholar)</p>
<p>Bowdoin: 7,500 also high expectations for my summer work, and more loans than I'd like. Actually would have been better b/c of National merit (changes loans to grants) but I decided not to go there.</p>
<p>State school (WVU): merit scholarships plus state/federal grants would have covered everything.</p>