<p>1 London Business School U.K. 145,776 132
1 University of Pennsylvania: Wharton U.S.A. 171,551 123
3 Harvard Business School U.S.A. 170,238 116
4 Insead France / Singapore 147,883 108
4 Stanford University GSB U.S.A. 183,260 115</p>
<p>Business</a> school rankings from the Financial Times - Global MBA Rankings 2011</p>
<p>Wow, a London bases paper putting a UK school at the top. </p>
<p>Listen, Harvard is #1, globally. If a UK school is going to be tops, at least make it Oxford/Cambridge.</p>
<p>^^ Your post makes it clear that you understand absolutely nothing. Both Oxford (Said) and Cambridge (Judge) are only about 30 year old business schools. Although the brand names Cambridge and Oxford are extremely popular , the business schools are not yet that good. Nevertheless, they can be considered top 20 business schools.</p>
<p>About LBS, it is undisputed the best business school in Europe.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>LBS is quite a bit better than Judge and Said.</p>
<p>I’m humbled there’s so much love for LBS on this forum. ;)</p>
<p>“I’m humbled there’s so much love for LBS on this forum.”</p>
<p>Most people on this board are ignorant idiots who know nothing about what they are saying.</p>
<p>Though, I do think putting LBS ahead of Harvard, Stanford, and Wharton clearly shows the bias of the UK based FT. LBS is more on the level of Booth, Tuck, Kellogg, etc. (which the FT happily and ridiculously relegated to 12, 18, and 21).</p>
<p>Business school is a joke. You don’t need an old program to make it any better. Oxford and Cambridge are Ivy league level universities and well known in the USA as well as globally. Get real. FT has the worst rankings.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>INSEAD > LBS
*
not to mention the INSEAD / Wharton Alliance:*
<a href=“http://www.insead.edu/alliance/[/url]”>http://www.insead.edu/alliance/</a>
<a href=“http://www.wharton.upenn.edu/locations/whartoninsead-alliance.cfm[/url]”>http://www.wharton.upenn.edu/locations/whartoninsead-alliance.cfm</a></p>