<p>If your family makes under 60,000 a year, then there is a very very good chance you will not have to pay tuition next year. It was just approved by a subcommittee of the UC Regents today! Here is the link....</p>
<p>What do they mean by fees? They can't mean tuition: "About 48,100 undergraduates would be eligible under the plan, according to university officials. The $3.1 million required to enact the plan for the 2009-10 academic year..." comes out to about $64.49 per eligible student.</p>
<p>Why don't they just give people long-term low-interest loans instead of busting their budget trying to give people free schooling? Something like a 10-year loan at 1% above inflation seems fair to me.</p>
<p>"The regents will vote on UC President Mark Yudof's proposed Blue and Gold Opportunity Plan which, if passed, would waive UC tuition fees for California undergraduates from families making less than $60,000."</p>
<p>Once again, FAFSA calculation has further ****ed me. Thanks for zero need, guys! I'll just go back to maximizing my unsubsidized Stafford loan and taking a minimum course load to work.</p>
<p>SAN FRANCISCO--The UC Board of Regents approved the Blue and Gold Opportunity Plan and newly defined university eligibility requirements at its meeting today.</p>
<p>The Blue and Gold Opportunity Plan-which will cover all systemwide fees for students who are below the $60,000 household income-passed unanimously, while the overhauled eligibility requirements passed with only one abstention.</p>
<p>The new university eligibility plan eliminates the required SAT subject tests, which previously disqualified 22,000 students from eligibility annually. Under the proposal, total application numbers could increase by 12 to 17 percent.</p>
<p>However, the proposal would limit the number of students guaranteed admission to the top 9 percent of high school students in the entire state compared to the 12.5 percent who are currently guaranteed a place. Meanwhile, the top 9 percent of an individual high school would be guaranteed admission, a jump from the current guarantee of the top 4 percent.</p>
<p>Regent Judith Hopkinson abstained, saying that the new plan to redefine statewide guaranteed admission conflicted with university objectives of accessibility.</p>