<p>^ You assumed a 20 week semester, which is really far off. You’re basically paying for just a bit over 14 weeks of food (this makes it worse, I know), so that’s 336 meals under then 24 plan or 196 under the 14 plan, we’ll round to 340 and 200 because, as I said, it’s just a bit over 14 weeks.</p>
<p>You also have to take into account flex dollars, though, which you essentially get back in that you can spend them at a variety of other locations. The 24 plan gives you $100 flex dollars vs. $75 for the 14 plan, so the actual cost of the plans is $2090 and $1870.</p>
<p>This, then, works out to a per meal cost of $6.15 for the 24 plan and $9.35 for the 14 plan, so there is, in fact, a larger gap than your estimate indicated. Your basic conclusion, that paying for 24 and eating 16 works out better, is still accurate, though, as this would work out to $9.33. </p>
<p>Assuming you eat a standard 3 meals a day and you eat them all at Leo’s (you won’t), you’d be paying $7.11 per meal. You could definitely “beat” that price, even without cooking for yourself, particularly when you look at the fact that breakfast will almost always be substantially less than $7.</p>
<p>I told you before that 24 was a good idea, and I had done it myself. I still agree with that, but just to play devil’s advocate. Let’s say you get the 10 meal plan: $1701 of which you get $50 back as flex dollars, leaving a final cost of $1651. Now, let’s say you’re just happy eating milk and cereal for breakfast every morning. A box of cereal costs like $3 and will last you a week, a half-gallon of milk will cost you $2, so you can get by for breakfast at $5 per week ($70 for the semester). We’ll say you always eat dinner in the dining hall and use the other three meals on three lunches. So, right now, you’ve spent $1721 and all you need to do is cover lunch three times per week, or a total of 42 lunches. If you can pay less than $8.78 for each of these lunches, then you beat the cost of the 24 plan.</p>