<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>Firstly, what are the chances of an international student getting into a medicine course at a US college?</p>
<p>Secondly, what are the chances of an international student getting into a Ivy league college, such as Harvard, for a medical course?</p>
<p>Thirdly, what are the financial aid options possible for International student doing a medicine course in the US? What about the top ivy league ones, who claim to be need-blind for ALL applicants? </p>
<p>Fourthly, I've heard that medical courses in the US are tres long. 10 years or something, with internship and specialization. But suppose I did a MBBS course elsewhere, then can I get into a graduate school in the US to specialize in a field?</p>
<p>And fifthly, I hate the SAT.</p>
<p>I really want to get into a top college, so is a 700+ score in all 3 sections a must?</p>
<p>As an international student SAT prep is difficult...we don't have good teachers or courses for it. And worse of all, you need good English skills to do well in it. </p>
<p>So if I don't do well in the SAT but I do well in other exams like A levels then will this help my application to a Ivy-league university? Forget about medicine, what about to another course like engineering?</p>
<p>What are my changes of getting in, considering the below qualifications...</p>
<p>I did the SAT subject tests and came up with (after a week of self-study):
800 for maths level 2
770 for chemistry
750 for physics.</p>
<p>I had no idea that time was a problem with the Sat 2. I went in to the exam, without having done a single practice test....ending up leaving a huge chunk of questions blank. I know it's my fault...but then again I had A levels to concentrate on...</p>
<p>Then came the Sat 1...likewise in here I didn't do any practice tests..but just went through the types of questions and some advice, one week before test day. But I knew that I had to do the exam as fast as I can, having had a bitter experience with the SAT 2.</p>
<p>But I ended up with:
790 for Maths.
600 for critical reading.
600 for writing.</p>
<p>I expected this.</p>
<p>Right now I am starting to prepare for another SAT..which I will be taking on OCT 11. I did the SAT practice test on that SAT booklet and after scoring I discovered that I was, other than for maths, I did weakly:</p>
<p>590 for reading
540-620 for writing depending on the Essay score.</p>
<p>So i analyzed my weak areas and found out that I was weak in vocab. I realised that if I wanted to score 700+ for reading, I should memorise the meanings of tonnes of vocab. This is idiotic of the SAT. How come that we need to recognize the meanings of words that would only appear on the SAT exam...not before, not after...just on the SAT?. The SAT is not testing our intelligence but rather how we are prepared for the SAT. I really can't be bothered memorising vocab just to get 700+ on the SAT. What's the use of those words anyway?</p>
<p>That said, I realise that I need a good score to get in. I'll have to do some idiotic studying to get 700+ in reading and writing.</p>
<p>But assume that I got only 1990 for the SAT, will the Ivy-league readers consider me, considering that I've done well in A levels?</p>
<p>Normally people take 4 subjects for AS (first year of A levels) and then they drop one and take 3 subjects for A levels. Oxbridge asks for a minimum of A<em>AA to be considered. A</em>A<em>A would be ideal and give you a 20% chance of getting in. 40% of people studying at Oxbridge, however, have got A</em>A<em>A</em>A*.. That's four subjects.</p>
<p>But I took 6 subjects and got A<em>A</em>A<em>A</em>A*A. Will the ivy-league unis consider this as meritorious or will they ignore this and look to see whether I've got 2200+ in an exam that just requires it's takers to learn tonnes of meaningless vocab and have good English? </p>