<p>do so! :D </p>
<p>Narcissa: can u provide a link/source to that evidence? I couldn't understand what you said.</p>
<p>theoretically, 1 + 1 = 3</p>
<p>
[quote]
I believe u like theoretical mathematics!
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I LOVE theoretical mathematics.</p>
<p>Narcissa, show me that evidence in any research paper.</p>
<p>
[quote]
theoretically, 1 + 1 = 3
[/quote]
</p>
<p>SIKE</p>
<p>explain...that's not possible unless you purposely screw up your math.</p>
<p>which evidence?
the evidence for transitional fossils?
well I don't have research papers on hand right now, but there's always wikipedia
Transitional</a> fossil - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</p>
<p>or the evidence that 1 + 1 = 2 :)</p>
<p>Narcissa, I still don't see the "human" transitional fossils.</p>
<p>List</a> of human evolution fossils - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</p>
<p>hmm
do you guys really not believe in evolution?</p>
<p>Sheed, here's some for human skulls, but ignore the Christian commentary at the bottom.</p>
<p>"explain...that's not possible unless you purposely screw up your math."
theoretically, on a molecular level, all numbers are equal. Thus, 1 + 1 can equal 3, 4, or watever</p>
<p>creationists are beginning to ask stuff like "do you REALLY want to believe you evolved from monkeys?" or "if you BELIEVE that you evolved from dirt, than you're going to act immorally!!"</p>
<p>The question is not what we want to "Believe" in, but what is actually true. Just because everyone wants to believe in creationism, doesn't mean that it's true. Also works the other way, I guess.</p>
<p>
[quote]
explain...that's not possible unless you purposely screw up your math.
[/quote]
Let me define a = 1 and b = 3. let me also define b = 2a. then a + a = b and 1 + 1 = 3. Of course, i would have to redefine conventional symbols. but they are symbols nonetheless and can be defined really any way you want.</p>
<p>or</p>
<ol>
<li>a = b + 1<br></li>
<li>(a-b)a = (a-b)(b+1)<br></li>
<li>a2 - ab = ab + a - b2 - b<br></li>
<li>a2 - ab -a = ab + a -a - b2 - b<br></li>
<li>a(a - b - 1) = b(a - b - 1) </li>
<li>a = b </li>
<li>b + 1 = b<br></li>
<li>Therefore, 1 = 0
and if we add 2 to both sides, 3 = 2 and 1 + 1 = 3 :)</li>
</ol>
<p>Thanks for the evolutionary links.</p>
<p>Let me define a = 1 and b = 3. let me also define b = 2a. then a + a = b and 1 + 1 = 3</p>
<p>That makes ZERO sense :D</p>
<p>If b=2a and b=3
then 2a=3
then a =1.5
1.5 does not equal 1
therefore your proposition is false</p>
<p>And your other one is just some weird paradox that has a miscalculation</p>
<p>
[quote]
Let me define a = 1 and b = 3. let me also define b = 2a. then a + a = b and 1 + 1 = 3
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Oh, okay. So why don't I just say that the word "sky" is synonymous with "Asian pear?" If I say it, it must be true.</p>
<p>I like Asian pears.</p>
<p>what is the definition of truth? how do you know what is real and what is correct? You are hardly even aware your alive. 3 + 3 = 1000 makes a whole lot more sense than the big bang theory.</p>
<p>I like Sky</p>
<p>WE like the same thing!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>esmitty01 (I think therefore I am, that's what everything rides on)</p>
<p>What about my alive?</p>
<p>WHAT?????!!!!!! EXPLAIN YOURSELF ROCKER,,,,, EXPLAIN! lol</p>
<p>what if the Matrix was real. then a= 2893 and b= 2903443 so c is obviously equal to 0 when a is added to b an infinate amount of times, exponentially of course.</p>
<p>Please don't bring Descartes into this.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I don't follow. How so?</p>