<p>I am in the camp of going to the best school be surrounded by high calibre students with the same drive and intellectural curiousity. When people are challenged (pushed by their peers), they tend to do better, and it certainly would make for better classroom discussion. What I do not buy is by raising SAT scores few points would drastically make Cornell a better institution. What it would lose (attracting talented fashion designer, architects, hotelies) is more than what it would gain. </p>
<p>As far as prestige, only high schoolers and maybe new college students, would rely solely on the US News ranking. I appreciate the fact that it must feel good to tell a friend that you go to a school which is ranked #8 instead of #15. Trust me, just for that, I would have liked to say to my friends that my younger daughter is going to Yale instead of Cornell. But at the end of day, would she have been happier at Yale, receive a better education at Yale, have better post-graduate opportunities? Knowing what I know today by looking at my older kid, her friends from Cornell, her friends from HS who went to other higher ranking schools, and her colleagues at work (enough data for you?), my conclusion is Cornell would be a very good schoold for D2 and she wouldn’t be missing out by not going to a school like Yale.</p>
<p>I know most of you are still focusing on your academic stats - if I got 780 and he got 720 then I have a better chance of getting into a school, if I worked hard for to get 3.9 then it should my right to get a spot at HYPS instead of someone with 3.7. In the business world (even in IB where it is very numbers dirven) it doesn’t work like that. It is not the smartest person who gets promoted and it is certainly not the smartest person who gets to be a manager. I know that because it has taken me a lot longer than some of my peers to get to where I am. Even when you have the best idea, you need buy in from your senior managers, your colleagues, and more importantly people who work for you. </p>
<p>When I was younger, I thought it was enough to just walk into a boardroom, wow people with my brilliant idea, everyone would clap, and we would be done. Little did I know, my new idea may make a senior person look bad, or a vendor I want to replace may be a long time friend of someone at work, or it could mean displacing a large number of employees. I also found out that emotion is a very big factor when people make business decisions, it is never just about numbers. Very similar to holistic admission.</p>
<p>SAT does not measure emotional intelligence (EQ), without it, you will not get very far in a lot of careers. I have known high performing traders, bankers, lawyers who were let go because they couldn’t work well with others. </p>
<p>Schools like WUSTL, Chicago, JHU…have moved up in ranking. As someone who is in the position to hire, my response is “so what?” My firm still doesn’t recruit at those schools. I get friend kid’s resume from JHU or other non-target schools because a lot of those banks just don’t recruit on campus. JHU is trying to re-make itself by attracting more well rounded “normal students,” but it will take few years for it to stick (image takes a long time to change). NU gets more kids into banking and consulting than Chicago. I think most people would say Chicago students have higher IQ than NU students or Michigan, but employers like NU, Michigan, Cornell students. </p>
<p>One last thing, in real life, people do not talk about “lower Ivy,” worry about if UPenn is higher ranking than Cornell, most people probably couldn’t even name all 8 Ivies (the one that’s left out is usually Brown). Go where it will be the best “fit” for you, even when it comes to which school within Cornell. The quality of education is not going to be that different between a school ranked 15 vs 10.</p>