<p>Hopefully I didn't offend anyone here. Through I didn't really pick "offensive" examples, I just want to make sure that no harm was ever meant by me and if I did offend you, I am sorry!</p>
<p>Is compromise always the best way to resolve a conflict?</p>
<p>Compromises is probably one of the best ways to solve problems, however, most compromises never work out in the end. When people compromise, each side loses something which anger and annoy both sides. Several examples that demonstrate this belief can be found in history, politics, and personal experience.</p>
<p>To start off, the result of the Civil War was essentially a compromise between the North and the South. After the war, the North rebuilt the south and compromised a series of laws for a more "just", "democratic" world. In the time of the northern reign, this set of rules worked out. The North go the freedom for everyone reasoning, but only for a limited time. The South got back their power, but now they have to be more justified and respectful to the colored. But the minute the Northerns stepped down for the power and handed it back the the biased southerners, the compromise was essentially wiped out. Many compromises include blacks and colored could be segregated, but the facilities must be equal (a failed attempt) and colored could sit on the bus, but must give up his or hers seat when a white appeared. Thus, compromises don't work out when placed in reality.</p>
<p>Another example can be found in current politics. As many Americans are aware, Washington is trying to find middle ground between the Democrats and the Republicans. They need to find a plan to limit and lower the debt, while still maintaining the economic prosperity our country used to have before the recession. Almost everyday for the past 5 months, news agencies have been reporting the arguments and highlights of what happened that day. Many Americans are advocating a compromise and many representatives/senators agree with that idea. However, they still, to this day, have not reached a middle ground. Therefore, compromises cannot be used and placed in practical means.</p>
<p>As demonstrated by my own family, compromises are rarely reached without some sort of argument. To give one example would be exercising vs studying. Since I am a junior in high school, I have to study hard and diligently for almost all tests in all subjects. For the tuesday that this incident occurred, I was prepping for my anatomy class. It was late and I was just getting started on my last task: studying, when my father came in and abruptly announced we are going exercising! I vehemently opposed, since I'm not done with schoolwork, etc. But he, as well, vehemently said I need to go exercising whether I like it or not. We tried to compromise, but my father was obstinate and continued to insist on his way and ONLY his way, showing again how hard it is to make compromises work.</p>
<p>Compromises are good in theory when one wants to avoid arguments with another. However that case rarely ever works out. The racism compromise in the late 19th century didn't work out in a whole century (mid/late 1800s to mid/late 1900s -> Civil Rights Movement). My compromise with my dad didn't work out either. And so didn't it work out in Capitol Hill. As shown from all throughout history, government, and life, compromises are not he best way to resolve a conflict.</p>