<p>If you could say something to our president Geroge Walker Bush. What would it be?</p>
<p>Thank-you, George, for bringing back conservative values to this grand nation. You, my friend, have led us through the most tumultuous times with great, great leadership. Please run for a third term as president!</p>
<p>Are you serious????????</p>
<p>I don't think George Bush should've decided to go to war in Iraq with no proof of "weapons of mass destruction." We should have those troops in Afghanistan looking for Osama bin Laden before he attacks again. I think that if we knew what George Bush ended up doing for the election, then Kerry would've won. What are the approval ratings now? Like 38%?</p>
<p>Yeah George Bush is a bad president when it comes to thinking ahead of time and making the right desicisions.</p>
<p>Jonathan K. I'm starting to think you're a smart man.
Robert E. Lee...i have no words. But then again everything you do seems to be to get a rise out of people...I'm sure you're a troll.</p>
<p>Bush, you're a good man and president, don't let the tards (especially all the punkvoters) , get to you. LOL and convince Jeb to run in 08. Would be sweet. Oh and can you invade France? They're pretty gay (literally).</p>
<p>Atom you are really retarded acting. :p lol</p>
<p>Why? for having my own opinion? Is it wrong to actually support the president? You guys are all such tools...</p>
<p>The president sucks and is to me the worst we have ever had! </p>
<p>Clinton, and Carter! were the best!!!!!</p>
<p>Carter!?!?? ROFL, now not even liberals can't take anything you say seriously...</p>
<p>In case you never knew: the economic prosperity that Clinton enjoyed during the later stages of his presidency were due to Reagan's policies that were implemented in the late 80s. It takes about a decade for economic changes from such a large change that he made to become visible. And for all of those who say Bush caused a recession... the recession was actually started BEFORE Clinton left office. It's a fact, look it up. Clinton was a fairly bad president. I'll admit he was extremely personable and charismatic, but as far as policies were concerned, he completely sucked. His foreign policies were awful. His domestic politicies were slightly better, but he took credit for everything when really it was none of his doing. The republicans actually controlled Congress, so Clinton unproperly gets a lot of credit for bills that the republican congress actually passed (like welfare reform).</p>
<p>GWB is no conservative. He spends and wastes more than that scumbag Clinton ever did. GWB is weak. He cannot deal decisively with terrorists.</p>
<p>I agree that Bush isn't as conservative as I would personally like. But, in my opinion, economic policies don't matter as much right now. Fighting terrorism is way more important to me than economic policies. What's the point of having a booming economy if tons of our citizens are killed in terrorist attacks?</p>
<p>Bush has spent a lot, but he also HAD to after the September 11th attacks. Of course he is going to have to spend more, are you kidding me? The increase in government size wasn't pointless beaurocrats like what normally happens, it was in counter-terrorist units, who actually are worth the money. Any president would have had to spend a lot more in these times.</p>
<p>Here is where you are wrong. Bush is quite decisive with dealing with terrorists. How can you even make such an absurd statement like that? What if Kerry or Gore had won? How do you think he'd deal with them? It would have been a disaster. What upsets off liberals IS bush's decisiveness. He doesn't take any BS from terrorists, and truly realizies this is an all out war. Liberals don't understand it. They think terrorists are political activists or something, and don't realize they're coldblooded killers who need to be taken out. They're unconventional, and thus we need to fight them unconventionally.</p>
<p>I think he is doing a Great Job; Im satisfied with my Vote and would do it again without any regret. I am so very grateful for the strong conservative thoughts that you have finally brought back to this fine country. After the **** poor Clinton almost destroyed this country, you have shined and brought America back to what it should be. You are making the GOP very happy and we are all very confident in our leader. Since you have a good term left ahead of you, I am personally asking for you to continue the war in Iraq, I agree with it 100% and dont want to rush it. Id also like to commend you on getting these dumb ******* illegal out of our country, arrest them and move them back or hey why not the just shoot the bastards, a bullet is cheaper than the fuel anyway. Also Thanks so Much for putting your foot down on gay marriage; you have again done a great thing. I also hope that your attempts on roe vs. wade are successful, as it would be a great thing for mankind and America,</p>
<p>Sir thank you for your time it was a HONOR & a pleasure.</p>
<p>I hate you dumb democrats. You will believe anything you are told, its kind of sad that with that stupidity they even let you into a University.</p>
<p>And I hate trolls. :)</p>
<p>The liberals think they're completely rebelling against "the man" still. They blame all of their problems on Bush. It's completely insane. The ironic part is when they think theyre being so unique, they're actually complete tools like they think they aren't. They believe anything that the radical liberals tell them. It's kind of like "goths" in that way..</p>
<p>Only siths deal in absolutes. LOL</p>
<p>
[quote]
The increase in government size wasn't pointless beaurocrats like what normally happens, it was in counter-terrorist units, who actually are worth the money
[/quote]
Yes, counter terrorism departments like the ****ing EPA and Dept. of Education...</p>
<p>
[quote]
Bush is quite decisive with dealing with terrorists. How can you even make such an absurd statement like that? What if Kerry or Gore had won? How do you think he'd deal with them? It would have been a disaster. What upsets off liberals IS bush's decisiveness. He doesn't take any BS from terrorists, and truly realizies this is an all out war.
[/quote]
Wrong. Bush's war is half baked at best. He doesn't have any moral fiber. Deep down, he cannot point out religious fundamentalists because he himself is religious. If he had conviction, he would have nuked/napalmed/carpet bombed the middle east. Instead, you have a war in which soldiers cannot even shoot at civilians. This is a travesty to war. Read some of Patton's writings about how a war should be conducted.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Liberals don't understand it. They think terrorists are political activists or something, and don't realize they're coldblooded killers who need to be taken out. They're unconventional, and thus we need to fight them unconventionally.
[/quote]
Bush went on television and called Islam a religion of peace. This is the sign of decisiveness? Religious fanatics murder 3000 of our men, and he apologizes to Islam?</p>
<p>Look, if Gore or Kerry had been elected, they would have done nothing, since they are first rate idiots. But you cannot honestly say that Bush is doing a fabulous job either.</p>
<p>Terrorists are terrorists. They shouldn't be given Korans at Guantanamo Bay, they shouldn't have religious service, they should be fed swine. Now thats taking some steps in the right direction. Calling Islam a religion of peace is not.</p>
<p>LOLOLOLOLOL, it's so funny to bring politics into a movie that has nothing to do with politics!!! It COMPLETELY makes me respect the producers!!1</p>