I have to write an essay about dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I have a good start, but I was wondering if you guys could help a little. I just need a few points on this part of the question. “Did military necessity outweigh the humanitarian and moral objections to the use of this weapon?”
Just a few points so I have more to work on. You don’t need to go into detail, just basic points.
Thanks!</p>
Potsdam, yalta conferences. D day. Unconditional surrender. Stalin joining the war against Japan. Iwo jima. Casablanca. Leapfrogging. Liberating France. </p>
Sent from my Desire HD using CC</p>
dehumanization of the human life (making war even less personal) and risk of leading a series of a events that causes nuclear war</p>
vs.</p>
saved lives compared to a theoretical mainland invasion against Japan and necessity of decreasing Japanese morale to force surrender</p>