Hey Roger...

I’m sure this gets brought up a zillion times on here, but I will feel better for asking myself. Okay so this is about the 60 second rule. WAIT! Don’t leave yet. I know it’s extremely useful, but I think I have an idea. What if we make the time between posts proportional to the number of posts the poster has? Of course you’d never have to eliminate the time completely (say 30 seconds for all senior members, that being the least amount anyone can get between posts). This would still prevent random people from spamming because you’d have to post 1,000 posts just have a 50% decrease in the time. They’d have to be rather dedicated to CC to even get that far :slight_smile: . I think with the new server and all, CC could handle this. Thanks for listening.

Honestly, why can’t you all just wait the friggin one minute??? It’s not like the end of the world…

^^redski: its just really annoying when you’re trying to participate in a fast and furious and insightful conversation but by the time you make your comment, its totally out of place because tons of people post before you…

roger pleaseeeeeeeee consider gunner’s request… :slight_smile: thanx

Actually I kind of like the rule! Though I do love gunner :wink:

LOL celeb… i think 30 seconds for senior members might make it more fun/fair/convenient though… and yes i love gunner too…as you already know…hehehe:D :wink:

Rules like the 60 sec. rule are forum wide- I don’t think there’s an easy way to differentiate between users.

Celebrian would have to post every minute for three hours a day for two months to reach that many posts. Sorry, I have no life and am in no way trying to offend anyone.

How many posts?

I want to know too :stuck_out_tongue:

10500 posts

Yeah but now I don’t understand your entire statement.

^confused :stuck_out_tongue:

9 hours later and she has an additional 77 posts. :eek:

thats low for her

^ how would you know that’s low for me anyways?

Because I watch your post count.

why? that’s freaking

<em>looks around for crazy stalker</em>