<p>I'm wondering what's more likely to occur in law school admissions? Someone with a 3.0ish GPA but an LSAT score at 170 or higher, or someone with a 3.7-3.8 GPA with a low LSAT score?</p>
<p>Please don't tell me High GPA, High LSAT. I know. Shut up.</p>
<p>It varies. At Berkeley a 166, 4.0 is better than a 180 2.9. At Northwestern, a 171, 2.9 is better than a 166 4.0. You'll be hard-pressed to get into Stanford or Yale with less than a 3.8.</p>
<p>Still, it's pretty safe to say that in general LSAT is weighted more heavily and certainly you can overcome a subpar GPA much more easily than a subpar GPA. </p>
<p>A 180, 3.4 will be in at a TOP 4 school, while a 150 3.8 would be hard-pressed to get into a TIER 4 school..</p>
<p>What school and what major? Course 2 at MIT vs. sociology at Quinnipiac? A quant major at a tough school with a high LSAT will do a lot better than a perfect GPA from a grade inflated school, easy major with a mediocre LSAT.</p>
<p>You must be kidding. A 3.4/180 will, like cherokeejew alluded to, get you into most t14 schools. A 150/3.8 will put you in the running for AT BEST third tier schools. Don't really know where you got this idea from.</p>
<p>^Even that's a big stretch imo. Go to lawschoolnumbers.com, where you can search all schools and users by LSAT/GPA score. A 3.4/180 will get you in everywhere but YHS. A 3.85/165 will result in rejections from most t14. Guys, the LSAT is weighed much heavier than GPA, and law school admissions reflect this.</p>
<p>FNS's estimate above is obviously ridiculous. Choco's seemed right to me but MW's assessment caused me to go and play with the numbers a little. MW seems right.</p>
<p>Well, Chiashu is not omniscient, and it certainly fails here (and with splits in general).</p>
<p>176, 3.8 will get you into everything outside of HYS for sure, give 3/4 at Harvard and put you in the running at Stanford, Yale.</p>
<p>180, 3.4 will give you 0 chance at Stanford or Yale, near 0 at Harvard, good chance but not shoe-in at NYU and fairly poor chances at Chicago, Columbia and Boalt. </p>
<p>While such a split can never be truly equivalent to a non-splitter (due to GPA fiends like Berkeley), I'd say it's most similar to a 170, 3.8. That will miss HYS, have a good chance at NYU, mediocre chance at Chicago and poor chance at Columbia.</p>
<p>3.4/180 will get you in everywhere except for HYS and likely Boalt. A 3.4/180 will be a poor chance at Columbia's Hamilton, it will still be a near auto-admit to Columbia. Take a look at LawSchoolNumbers.com</a> | LawSchoolNumbers.com Except for Boalt and Stanford, every school values the LSAT more than GPA. For Y unfortunately, a high LSAT and high GPA are needed :(</p>
<p>I passed by the Cardozo school building on my way back from the movies on friday....just something random I wanted to share...I didn't know they were on 5th ave.</p>
<p>"I wish, but 180 3.4 has essentially no chance at Harvard."</p>
<p>A 3.4/180 has an outside shot of Harvard Law if the 3.4 is from HYP, a decent shot if its a legacy, a great shot if its a URM and virtually no shot otherwise.</p>
<p>my private tutor from testmasters got a 180 and a 3.4/3.5 with close to no ec's and got into almost every school other than HYS. he's going to Columbia</p>