<p>Compared to some of the other schools of the same level, how good looking are the girls at Columbia?</p>
<p>you'd find unattractive girls and attractive girls in any corner of this planet.</p>
<p>just like you'd find *******s and nice people anywhere.</p>
<p>^^ Let's hear a real answer now ... XP</p>
<p>wow...i wonder if this topic really comes up every year?</p>
<p>and yea, the above answer is correct...there are hot girls and there are not...its not a universal party school so most of the girls arent sluts like you are prolly hoping but the dating scene at columbia is really weird....but thats off topic (pm me if you are really curious tho, its kinda funny :P)</p>
<p>It's not USC or ASU, that's for sure. It probably is about the same as other elite Northeastern schools. Barnard arguably is better than Columbia in this respect, but Barnard also has a plethora of ultrafeminist girls who, well, don't look very feminine (not that such girls aren't also found at Columbia).</p>
<p>I would have expected the more flashy and outgoing type at Columbia because the school is in NYC, and the more reserved type to attend a school outside the city. More flashy and outgoing means more attractive. Maybe this is a bit of a stretch and I'm completely wrong.</p>
<p>I want to see some pictures of hot Columbia girls.</p>
<p>why not scan through the girls on myspace that attend columbia?</p>
<p>That's a great idea, I'll go do that now.</p>
<p>^^ haha wow. someone has too much free time.</p>
<p>The girls look pretty hot, I am amazed.</p>
<p>tru that most guys end up with Barnard girls rather than Columbia girls?</p>
<p>the girls version of this thread seems slightly more popular than ours :(</p>
<p>
[quote]
The girls look pretty hot, I am amazed.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>What, are you 16? I think I remember that anything with long hair looks hot when you're 16.</p>
<p>^^^lmao so are you dogging the girls at Columbia?</p>
<p>It's a bell curve. There are a few hot ones, some cute ones, more average ones, and quite a few not-so-hot ones. To say "the girls looked pretty hot" is a gross exaggeration.</p>
<p>dont forget that some people photograph well and some photograph horribly and look the opposite of what they are....</p>
<p>Could be worse. Those might be pics of their hot looking friends, sisters, etc... (j/k).</p>
<p>Wow, you must have had low standards when you were 16.</p>
<p>i had low standards when i was 12, must be an early bloomer...</p>
<p>Why is this thread so much shorter than the 'how good looking are the guys' thread?</p>