<p>I recently took a biology practice test from PR and was disappointed that I only received a 670. I have been studying quite thoroughly over the summer (I have read Barron's countless times and have taken extensive notes) and am a bit confused. In your experience, how indicative are the PR practice tests (specifically biology) of the real thing? Any score comparisons would be greatly appreciated :)</p>
<p>I’m in a very similar boat as you, actually. However, I took the Biology E test about 2 years ago, after studying extensively from both PR and Barron’s. I ended up only receiving a 710, but the highest score I received on a PR practice test was about 600. I felt the PR tests were really comprehensive because they test you on potentially anything in their review section. As for resembling the actual SAT II Bio – not sure; I scored a 710 on the real test after scoring 600’s on PR practice test, so it’s your call. Overall I really like PR, though. Great resource :]</p>
<p>****ty books, barron’s is way better. the educational parts of pr, especially for physics, suck.</p>
<p>i bombed the SAT II but got a 5 on AP so i’m hoping that’ll make up</p>