How much do SAT II scores matter?

[Marian]

<p>

Many selective colleges have to choose students from a pool of almost perfect scorers . Although test scores are not sole factor of admission, it may be better for everyone if there would be nationwide tests measuring higher level of academic achievement available to all higher achievers. There are many things other than tests that show students’ ability. But it seems to me evaluating those for admission purpose is sometimes too subjective.

</p>

<p>I disagree. This would force the standardization of above-AP-level academic opportunities.</p>

<p>For example, if there was a Math III Subject Test, someone would have to decide on the curriculum that it covers. Should it include multivariable calculus, linear algebra, statistics with calculus, two of these three things, all three, or other things I haven’t thought of because it’s only 7:30 in the morning? Whatever the decision, students would then be locked into taking those specific courses.</p>

<p>I think the current informal situation is better. If a student takes a course (let’s say in math) that goes beyond the usual high school norms, it’s reported on the student’s high school transcript (or, if the student took it at a college, on the transcript the student has that college send). The record of having taken this course is one of a multitude of things that can make an applicant more interesting. And at the admissions stage, that’s all that matters. (Later, after the student is admitted, there can be complicated questions about placement, but those don’t matter during the admissions decision.)</p>