<p>I have read every word of this thread. </p>
<p>I wish Survivor the best recovery possible. Get the best help you can; then live the best life you can. </p>
<p>But I would like to pursue the OP’s original intent, which was to voice an admonition, an warning I endorse.</p>
<p>Selecting a college based upon brand or prestige works for a certain gifted minority of admits; the rest of the admit pool should go elsewhere — but the situation varies among the two types of ‘top’ schools.</p>
<p>Type I — the top privates. The grading is highly inflated (at virtually all but Princeton) for two reasons. First, many parents won’t continue to pay inflated tuition if their students don’t get a GPA greater than 3.5 . Second, these colleges feel they admit a monolithically high-performing freshman class and that weeder courses are not needed. These colleges are literally under the assumption that all of their graduates will go on to amazing success. The result is that students work moderately hard, and 80% of grads go on to professional schools, funded grad programs, or the top-paying jobs in management, finance, etc. at the best regional and national companies. Any admit who can handle the financing should go to any of these colleges.</p>
<p>Type II — the top publics. This would include UCB, UCLA, UM, UVA and a few others. These colleges admit a much more academically-diverse group of students for a variety of socio-political reasons, and this has great ramifications. These colleges feel that they have to cull the herd, so to speak — via weeder courses. Almost all students work almost insanely-hard, yet only the top 20% get the kind of GPA needed to go on to professional schools, funded grad programs, or the top-paying jobs in management, finance, etc. at the best regional and national companies. </p>
<p>If you don’t believe this, go through the career center grad data for UCB. I find it disheartening to see how the vast majority either don’t report or have gone on to somewhat menial pickings. Contrast this with career center data for, say, Williams, Amherst, Columbia, etc.</p>
<p>In my opinion, before going to a type II school such as Berkeley, ask yourself if you are in the top 20% of admits. Do you have >2200 SAT, >4.4 high school GPA with tons of AP’s (scores of 5’s) or IB’s (highest scores too)? If you’re doing anything Math/Science/Engineering/Comp Sci intensive, you should have close to 800 on SAT Math, Math SAT Subject Test 2 and Chem or Physics SAT Subject. If you do, you are positioned to be one of the 20% who go to Berkeley, work very hard, earn a high GPA, and go on to something very good. If you do not have these kinds of stats, you will work insanely hard, fighting for the lefover B’s and C’s. You may not believe it, but you will get a couple of D’s and F’s, destroying many or your dreams. You may not believe it, the very grading infrastructure is stacked against you.</p>
<p>If you are one of the 80% of students who don’t have these stats, take your acceptance email from ANY Type II college and run in the opposite direction like Forest Gump. Better yet, don’t apply to these schools in the first place. Don’t get sucked into the BRAND. The BRAND is for the grad students and the top 20%. You won’t get the BRAND, you’ll get the shaft.</p>
<p>Unless you’re sure you’re in the top 2% of the college population who go on to Harvard Grad School, Wall Street, Google, or Apple — why not go to UCSC, UCD, UOP, Arizona State, or a whole bunch of other top-100 colleges? Be with plenty of bright people. Work insanely-hard for your love of knowledge — or don’t. Your choice. Have a lot more fun and free time. Get a high GPA and get to your dreams.</p>
<p>Want to rate colleges? Don’t play the usual ratings games. Rate colleges on reported student happiness, quality of UNDERGRADUATE instruction, average grad earnings after 10 years, and admission data to grad and professional schools. The data is easy to find on the internet. You’ll be amazed at which colleges score high and which don’t.</p>