I agree, I would be careful about specifics on here, it is a small world, those kind of discussions, like
“how is Joe Schmoe at the University of Despair on Marimba”, maybe better off in private:).
There is no magical formula,but I tend to agree with the idea that if you financially can’t afford a place without loans, it may be worth scrubbing it even if it is that school that everyone says “if you don’t go there, you don’t make it”. I don’t recommend coming out with student loans, among other things these days performance majors tend to go on to grad school, and you don’t want that debt there, even if it can be deferred until you graduate, it is still there.
As far as teacher versus school, I think that you would need to weigh that but that a teacher who doesn’t do the kid will at a great school is not a good thing. The school and its environment of course are important, a great teacher at a school in the middle of nowhere where there aren’t the performance opportunities or networking opportunities may likely not be worth much, whereas the hip and happening school where the department on your instrument is so so and the level of the kids is meh, won’t do much for you, either. Personally I would put more weight on the teacher, not just in rep as being a ‘great teacher’, but how they work with your kid. Friend of my son’s who is a fantastic player transferred from the studio my son has been in, with a teacher who is one of those teachers everyone wants to study with, to go to another school wth a teacher he had worked with before college, because he felt that teacher was better for him (both are top schools, though the one he went to is on average better than the one he transferred from). The name of a school has some benefits, but it doesn’t create a road paved with gold, either, and honestly I would put the ‘name value’ of the school well below the teacher. Other factors are how strong are the other kids in the studio and the school as a whole, some kids need to be pushed, others are happy as the big fish in a small sea, a kid may do better being one of the Avis kids (We’re number 2 and try harder) than being a number 1 there…
That program that gives a great financial aid package but only has one teacher might be fraught, because what if that teacher doesn’t work out? Unless you know for sure the kid loves the teacher, has worked for them before, was driven to new heights, that is something to think about, too.
And yes, the environment the school is in could be a factor, a city kid in a rural school might not do well, the kid who hates cold may not do very well at Eastman…it is below other factors IMO, but it is something to weigh if you have relatively equal choices.
So I would do it this way:
1)Money, if a program is too expensive, would require too much sacrifice on the family or heavy loans, then skip those programs no matter how good the teacher is (if the teach really likes the kid, you can always try appealing the package, of course, doesn’t hurt).
2)Once you weed that out, teacher. Not scientific, but based on what the kid hopefully has seen or heard, which teacher do they think they can work with? While kids get teachers without having worked with them, and do well, I think it is really important to try and get to know the teachers involved, music learning is not like algebra, one size doesn’t fit all in terms of learning, it is master/apprentice.
3)The school itself, what kind of performance and networking does it have, the name alone doesn’t mean anything (and if you are tempted to look at USNWR or one of the ratings guides, grab a cattle prod and give yourself a jolt until the impulse passes lol).What is the level of students, will they detract or drive your kid forward
4)The environment, among schools seemingly equal, which environment overall would help them achieve? This shouldn’t be the biggest consideration, no music student failed to achieve because the school didn’t have a great greek life or football team, but some students would feel more happy at a place like that, others would like the urban environment with a lot of different things to do and diverse people, it all depends.
If I had to describe the above, it would be a sieve, where the schools/teachers ‘fall below’ to the next level, and among the candidates that fall through financially (appear doable), then you rank the teachers, if they are equal, then weigh in the schools of those teachers again each other, first for the level of playing, facilities, etc, then the environment.
Not magic, how this all plays out, is up to the student in the end.