<p>Wait, back to the SCs. What the heck was the currency/inconclusive question? I don't remember that one.</p>
<p>did anyone get a question about napolen in the writing section....i put 'justified in taking.' did you get that answer as well???</p>
<p>i put 'currency/inconclusive' over 'word i dont remember/dubious'. what was the answer?</p>
<p>What were the other answer choices for the scholarly analysis one?</p>
<p>amcantu - I don't remember which answer choice I put down. Both of those choices seem familiar, but I don't know.</p>
<p>currency= prevalance, which makes that choice the right one.</p>
<p>Haha, if only I remembered what the question was...</p>
<p>on the scholarly analysis v. broad generalizations: I felt it was pretty clear that it was not a scholarly analysis. In scholarly works such as academic papers, literary criticism, etc. they always reference and cite the work of others and write in a more analytical style. The passage made numerous broad assertions with little substantiation, so I got "broad generalizations."</p>
<p>agree with descartes, scholarly analyses was actually the first answer choice i crossed off.</p>
<p>broad generalizations too. It wasn't personal anecdotes/hypothetical situations either.</p>
<p>was unsubstantiated or concealed the answer to the shadow question</p>
<p>i put concealed first, then i crossed it out and put unsubstantiated</p>
<p>its unsubstantiated.</p>
<p>i put the mouth because at the end of passage 1 it said something about "and the smile..."</p>
<p>why wouldn't it be personal anecdotes... i probably don't know what anecdotes mean</p>
<p>The part about his grandmother was only a short bit at the beginning, not something you would say was prevalent throughout the entire passage. I put broad generalizations too.</p>
<p>personal anecdotes are little stories about yourself in the past..although the author mentioned things in relation to himself (his grandfather) he never gave any stories.</p>
<p>which was the CR experimental section...</p>
<p>Im pretty sure it was section 3... but cant remember what it was about...</p>
<p>section 2: nature (city tree)
section 3??
section (i dont remember: monalisa
sec of 20min: uncle/niece</p>
<p>but.. didnt passage 2 mentioned many techniques throughout the passage? adding profile wouldnt be necessary for pssage 2</p>
<p>someone else was saying they were 100% sure it was "mouth"</p>
<p>lol</p>