<p>In truth, the core mission of the IB to address the needs of a transient population is undermined by the structure of the program. It is a truth that in the nomadic American population, a given student might not spend 3 years in a given high school, and though the program is in theory portable- it is not always the case. What is consistent are the assessments which are done, and the curricular content. What is not consistent is the timeline and this is the issue. Some schools require a 'pre-IB' year of courses (this was true for science at my son's HS, for example) and then 2 more years to do HL classes-effectively spreading the content over 3 years, for example.</p>
<p>Also what courses a school offers depends on the individual school. So, a student moving mid-IB or even after 10th grade might find themselves ill prepared or not able to take the courses they were taking. Having courses which last for 2 years is a major factor here.</p>
<p>I don't understand the 2 year course thing. IB is supposed to be college prep- correct? How many courses did you take in college which lasted 2 years?</p>
<p>I am not so concerned about the theoretically anti-Anglo-Western themes...I am very concerned that 350 people in Geneva apparently have been vested with so much control by so many people.</p>
<p>As it happens in my work I visit schools all the time and I have been in at least 15 schools which have the IB programs- some with PYP and MYP. What goes on in the schools varies substantially depending on the student population (what % are not English speakers in particular) and with the teachers. In many communities clearly inferior schools are trying to get IB affiliation as a selling point for potential parents. Kind of like having your school called Harvard Day School or Stanford Day school.....</p>
<p>Finally, the apparently self imposed superiority of many of the schools which provide IB is antithetical to some of their core mission. These schools are all about meaningful social service, correct? Well, in this community at least the most elite of the IB schools routinely exits students, including some who have been at the school since age 5, at 9th grade if the students have not done well on the 'intake to IB' exams (ICGSE) or if they have learning differences.</p>
<p>I think the world of social service should begin with meeting the needs of and being inclusive of your own student body. The students they exit are often very bright but underacheiving. Some cannot do a full IB because of learning differences, but could do certificates, which the school does not permit.</p>
<p>This school then goes on to report the 'highest IB scores in the world.' What does that mean when you have exited anyone who might lower your average? Is cherry picking to be admired?</p>
<p>I am all for thoughtful, inquiry based learning which stimulants intellectual growth and creates a committed community. I think IB is one of many ways this can be achieved and that parents and students need to inform themselves fully as they approach the program.</p>