<p>I think this stuff about the downside of the kid being driven to interviews and the parents being there speaks to cultural divides re: suburbs/country vs. city. Many kids at our urban high school, including my son, drive rarely or not at all, because it isn’t necessary for the vast majority of the things they do, and because parking space is too precious in the city for families to keep extra cars for the kids’ use. So it’s normal for them to get driven around to things they can’t get to on the subway. Many of them don’t even get their licenses until after they graduate (I know at least one kid from my son’s school who is now a sophomore in college and still hasn’t got her license). I have a hard time believing that admissions people are judging applicants on something that is so obviously relative to geographic and socioeconomic context.</p>
<p>As for talking with the interviewer, at most of the interviews we’ve done, we’ve all been sitting in a waiting room until the interviewer comes in to greet our son and whisk him off. Some of the interviewers have acknowledged us with a nod and a smile, some have shaken hands and introduced themselves, some have acted as if we don’t exist. At our son’s Clark interview, the interviewer actually made a point of asking us, when she and our son returned to the waiting room, if we had any questions. (We didn’t.) Again, I would be very surprised if any of this had a real impact on a kid’s admission–as long as the kid him/herself is behaving like a polite, reasonably self-confident, normal adolescent. </p>
<p>I mean, are people saying that part of the interview report would be “Came with parents–independence issues??” Really?!?</p>