<p>It is real. A lot of Orange County residents are very upset about the plans to perform this dangerous experiment next to homes and schools. </p>
<p>TMI and Chernobyl had more conscientious operators than San Onofre does. Both situation were operator error. The safety violations at San Onofre are the worst of any plant in the United States.</p>
<p>San Onofre came close to a meltdown a couple of years ago. The safety systems were off when the wildfires almost hit the plant.</p>
<p>It is also on top of a major earthquake fault.</p>
<p>Another interesting source is the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility. [Alliance</a> Home Page — Alliance For Nuclear Responsibility](<a href=“http://a4nr.org/]Alliance”>http://a4nr.org/)</p>
<p>This Indymedia article is very much worth reading. </p>
<p>[Radioactive</a> Waste: The San Onofre File : Indybay](<a href=“Radioactive Waste: The San Onofre File : Indybay”>Radioactive Waste: The San Onofre File : Indybay)
…
San Onofre’s liquid radwastes flow out of the plants through “outflows” pipes and empty into the Pacific. They are highly diluted but nevertheless still there.</p>
<p>According to the plant’s 2007 Radioactive Effluent Release Report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, there were 202 liquid effluent “batch” releases that year.</p>
<p>These releases lasted a total of 489 hours, or over 20 days. The longest was 7.6 hours in duration. The releases averaged 2.4 hours.</p>
<p>The releases contained many dangerous radioactive chemicals, including cesium 137, cobalt 60, iodine 131 and strontium 90.</p>
<p>Cesium 137 has a radioactive life of over 300 years, cobalt 60’s over 50 years, and strontium 90’s almost 300.</p>
<p>Iodine 131’s radioactive life is only a few months, but during that time it is intensely radioactive. I-131 mimics regular iodine, and concentrates in the thyroid gland if it enters our bodies.</p>
<p>I-131 caused high rates of thyroid cancer after Chernobyl exploded and burned its nuclear core, releasing virtually all its radioactivity.</p>
<p>San Onofre’s airborne radioactive releases included all of the radioactive chemicals cited above.</p>
<p>The 2007 report informs us “waste gas decay tank releases are considered to be ‘batch’ releases. Containment purges and plant stack releases are considered to be ‘continuous’ releases.”</p>
<p>Though San Onofre Unit 1 permanently shut down in 1992, the 2007 report states that its liquid and gaseous radioactive releases did not cease until 2006.</p>
<p>And in 2007, though Unit 1 had been shut down for nearly 15 years, a radioactive accident happened in April, the report states.</p>
<p>During the transfer of the contents of a large liquid container there, “a worker noticed a steady flow of water exiting a pipe onto the sand in an area that had been recently excavated.”</p>
<p>Turns out that a pipe had been “inadvertently severed…As a result, nearly all of the contents…about 2000 gallons, spilled through the severed pipe onto the sand.”</p>
<p>The spill contained “trace amounts” of cesium 137, according to the report. </p>
<p>…</p>
<p>However, numerous studies have found higher rates of cancers around nuclear power plants, such as the one reported recently in the OB Rag that found high mortality rates for childhood leukemia in counties adjacent to San Onofre. And virtually all nuke dumps, such as the massive one in Barnwell, South Carolina, have already leaked.</p>
<p>In addition, in 2005 the National Academy of Sciences committee to study the effects of radiation on our health concluded that there is no exposure to radiation without risk.</p>
<p>The committee’s chairman, Richard Monson of the Harvard School of Public Health, stated “The health risks—particularly the development of solid cancers in organs—rises proportionally with exposure. At low doses of radiation, the risk of inducing solid cancers is very small. As the overall lifetime exposure increases, so does the risk.”</p>
<p>And since San Onofre has been operating since 1970, there are all too many lifetime exposures already.</p>
<p>And you will note that EnergySolutions low level waste dump isn’t anywhere near its HQ of Salt Lake City, but instead embedded in a restricted and defiled region riddled with the remains of atomic explosions, whose memory will forever shame mankind.</p>
<p>San Onofre’s owners would like to operate their two remaining active reactors for an extra 20 years, until 2042, to continue their legacy of contamination for an extra generation, and its consequences for many more generations.</p>
<p>With true green energy looming on the horizon as real energy solutions for our future, why let the insanity that is San Onofre waste it?</p>