<p>I'm a Junior in high school and I got a 35 on the ACT last December. I am happy with my score, and I will be taking the test again in April as it is mandatory at my high school. Is it worth taking the SAT to improve my chances at the schools I am looking at? I plan on taking two SAT subject tests, but I don't really want to take the SAT. However, my dad thinks I should. Here are some of the schools I am looking at:</p>
<p>U of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (Illinois Resident)
Stanford - 1st Choice
MIT
UC Berkeley
UT Austin
UW Seattle?
Cornell
Northwestern</p>
<p>I think that all those schools will accept the ACT.</p>
<p>Have you read the webesites to see the test reporting policies of your schools? While many schools let you choose between sending the ACT or SAT (often +2 Subject tests), S does not accept Score Choice AND requires you to send BOTH ACT & SAT if you have taken them: </p>
<p>If you are satisfied with your ACT, get your parents involved and try to get out of taking it again. IMO (others disagree), I think the fewer times you test the better, for instance, Y says:</p>
<p>While sitting the ACT twice is not a lot, it’s unnecessary to take it and you could get a lower score the second time.</p>
<p>There are some schools that require the ACT and a couple Subject tests (Dartmouth I believe), so taking the Subject tests is good. And S lets you use Score Choice on Subject tests since they don’t require them.</p>