<p>i've done like four of them and scored between 770-800
but then today i tried one from barrons and got 670 or something
is McGraw Hill too easy? do you think i should continue with barrons or buy new prep books (pr or something)?</p>
<p>Um, yeah, I'm not sure what the difficulties of these tests are...I get 700 on Barron's, but only 630 on PR o_0</p>
<p>Meylani is the toughest for IIc and covers solid geometry pretty well.
The books usually have some unprinted pages etc but are worth it.</p>
<p>Barrons is overall very good.</p>
<p>The others are a bit flaky in terms of emphasis on a particular topic or other.
PR tends to be more tricky in the wording than in actual math content.</p>
<p>My friends and I have done well with Barrons and Meylani.</p>
<p>i know for a fact that rush is way too hard and 96 percent of it are concepts way too diificult to be on the level 2 test.</p>
<p>use sparknotes, pr, collegeboard tests, and maybe kaplan.</p>
<p>mcgraw book got HORRIBLE reviews so i don't trust that its good prep</p>
<p>When i studied for SAT2 math, I used Mcgraw Hill and Barrons.
i got 780-800 on all 8 tests in Mcgraw Hill, and on Barrons the highest score i got is a 670.
I got a 800 on the real thing though
I say mcgraw hill's not so good, doesnt cover enough materials, only the basics
Barrons cover way more, some you dont even need to know but worth it</p>
<p>yeah a 670 on barrons is EXCELLENT</p>
<p>ur looking at 770+</p>
<p>im thinking of continuing on w/ barrons and some other prep books maybe like kaplan..i was so shocked when i got a 670 on barrons but i guess i could work my way up and possibly aim for a 800 :]] thanks everyone</p>