<p>ahsie, you are entitled to your opinion. I am merely point out the facts. Michigan is elite in all major professional programs. Whether we are talking about the USNWR report or any other ranking, Michigan Business, Engineering, Law and Medicine are all elite. Arguably, all four of those professional programs are top 5 nationally...and according to virtually every source, those four departments are ranking in or around the top 10. </p>
<p>Michigan Business is always ranked between #2 (by WSJ and Businessweek and #10 or so (according to the USNWR). Michigan Engineering has always between ranked between #4 and #9 according to the USNWR. Michigan Law is ranked anywhere betwen #3 and #9 accordong to a multitude of rankings. And Michigan medicine has been ranked as high as #6 and as low as #11 according to the USNWR. The USNWR and Leiter reputational ratings are almost identical afterall.</p>
<p>As for Leiter, his ranking seems quite reliable...he is an alumnus of the University of Michigan afterall! LOL! He also taught at UT-Austin, which casts a shadow on his rating the UT-Austin Law school among the National 14 where most other Law School ranking would not include it. Besides, I don't understand why Leiter's PA score is any more reliable or accurate than the USNWR Law School Peer ratings. </p>
<p>At any rate, I do not see how that proves that Cal or Michigan are any weaker than NYU or Columbia. They all get roughly the same score and rating. All of them are elite.</p>
<p>If you like Leiter, you should check out his overall ranking of universities. I believe he ranks Michigan #3 or #4 overall. At any rate, as a state university overall, only Cal has a slight advantage over Michigan. UCLA and UVa are arguably as good. All four of those state schools are considered elite.</p>
<p>I would caution you against taking journal and article publication rankings too seriously. If you look at the ranking you provided above, there is a very small and truly insignificant difference between #3 and #17. You seem to take very small differences and try to rationalize differences based on fractional differences of the incaculable. In general, I think the difference in perception lies in definition. You definite elite as #1 and maybe #2 and in some cases #3. I define elite as the top 10 or top dozen. That is fine. But I think you are sometimes inconstant. For example, UIUC (in Engineering), UDub (in Medicine) and Chicago and NYU (in Law) would not generally be considered among the top 2 or 3 programs. Top 5, perhaps, but if that is the case, you must include more than 5 programs in each professional program, and in that, you would probably have to include Michigan, which is equal to UIUC in Engineering, UDub in Medicine and Chicago and NYU in Law. </p>
<p>Finally, your take on Engineering reputation is very limited. UIUC is not on par with Cal or MIT...or even Stanford or Caltech. It is equal to Michigan, Cornell, Carnegie Mellon and GT. Now in some circles, I am sure UIUC has a stronger reputation than Michigan. But in other circles, it is Michigan that has the upper hand. For example, in Western Europe and Latin America, Michigan is more recognized than UIUC. That does not mean it is better in Engineering.</p>