Two things: one, he and the coach turned out to be a bad match; and two, the isolation. Regarding the latter, the winters were too long for him and road trips to Burlington didn’t help enough I guess. Sibling loves it, but sibling likes the countryside and found Middlebury itself to be enough. The transfer is at Pomona now, no longer plays his sport, and is happy as a clam. Sometimes I question why, given that Pomona is Pomona, but it is a mere 35 miles from LA. Remember, this was a 19-year old kid. Sometimes they just get an angle on something and that’s it. I think he saw his sib flourishing there, both athletically and academically, and his visits tended to be during good weather and during busy times around the college. When things got more into a routine and cold, I think it became a different place for him. If he had been able to continue expressing himself athletically maybe it would have been different. I really don’t know. Like I said, kids do what they do sometimes.
As to your other comment, listen, I don’t intend to revisit that back and forth thing we had a couple of months ago. There are two comments in this thread that make both my position and intent on this subject clear.
- My comment in post #7: "Whether some place is "too remote" is purely a subjective matter. For many, many students, it is and in our experience it is often a deciding factor for kids who would otherwise want to to go to school there." That means that, of course, whether Whitman's geographic location is a good, bad or neutral thing for a prospective student is entirely subjective to the person and what they like and don't like. That should go without saying, but sometimes it doesn't.
- @rejnel 's comment in post #5: "The town--as noted above--is small but charming, and students work at/hang out at the cafes and restaurants. I will warn you, though, that when you are approaching Walla Walla from any direction, you'll spend some time traveling through what feels like the middle of nowhere. Then you arrive, you meet people, you get involved, and before long you wouldn't want to be anywhere else!" I agree with this post.
My only issue, and motivation for jumping in, is that I know what I’m talking about here, and I think some of the posts, while probably well intentioned, border on changing the facts and are thus misleading. I didn’t just visit this place one time and am bashing based on a bad day. I’m from Washington, I live in Seattle, I know tons of Whitties, I know Walla Walla, I’ve made that drive (at least to Pasco for soccer) at least 100 times and I’ve talked to many, many people considering or attending Whitman and who have compared its location to other schools. It’s one thing for you and others to answer questions by saying something like, “hey, you know what? it’s not really that bad. sure, it’s way out there, and be warned, it’s not near anything much other than the tri cities [and then go on to explain what the tri-cities are and are not], but the town is pretty cool and the campus is full of activity.” That’s one thing, and I’d actually agree.
But then you have posts like this guy’s:
“I hate to see Whitman dismissed because it is so “rural.” It’s not in the middle of cow country or even wheat fields. It’s in a lovely neighborhood in a small city that serves as a commercial center for a fairly large area.”
That is plainly inaccurate and in a sense misleading. He says Whitman is in a neighborhood. Well, no kidding - most schools are located some kind of neighborhood or town. No college I know of is actually on an actual farm. It’s in Walla Walla, a nice, but small, town, and Walla Walla, itself, is what’s in the middle of nowhere. Southeastern WA is, by definition, the middle of nowhere. The tri-cities are strip malls and sprawl and nothing much else spread over miles and miles.
If Whitman isn’t rural, then there is no rural. It’s the surrounding areas that define what’s considered rural and not.
Btw, I think “the middle of nowhere” there is beautiful. But that is besides the point.