<p>As to end_ dudes questions.</p>
<p>At first I found windows XP to be insecure and full of flaws, well even today it is still that but nothing is perfect we can only make things better than what they were in the past. I used Windows 98 for a while and then switched to windows ME (which many say is horrible, but I found it to be a decent transition model from Win 98 to XP). When Windows XP first came out, I installed it right away and found it to be a nice upgrade but it didnt have the best support and was full of coding errors. I waited until 2003 for the use of XP, and I found it to have been worked on greatly by Microsoft. It was acceptable for my needs. I am computer engineering major and I tend to know a lot more than the average folk about how computers work and the programming and machine code that makes them work. Most probroly dont care about this stuff and thats really understandable. MS windows XP as most MS programs are written in a very raw mode, the programmers and systems engineers are told and paid to pretty much get the thing working with the least time possible. As time goes on things tend to get better and better, we can see this trend with almost all products. So at first no product is its best and well even with a beta it has not been tested to its fullest. </p>
<p>So at this time as Ive used Vista I cant recommend it, firstly because this is a college board and well we do our school work on our computers. Now as I said earlier not all the problems in the code of the operating system can be see a at the release, Its impossible and this is why we have updates, Windows update for example. Or the newest Video Drivers.</p>
<p>Id really recommend waiting till at least the first major service pack, till I would move to the new OS. I am judging this on MS prior products and releases, such as Windows 98; we needed a whole new version to come out because of problems and USB support. </p>
<p>Microsoft does say things will be different this time, but only time will tell and I wouldnt take there word when my school work is on the line.</p>
<p>
[quote]
So is a Duo Core machine worth buying now or not?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>In August Intel will release the Core 2 Duo processor code named Merom; it will have 64 bit compatibility with a 64bit version of an operating system of your choice and 64 bit applications of your choice. The Higher end Core 2 Duo chips will have 4 MB of l2 cache, which is your systems memory but it is on the processors actual chip. The chips as with everything new will be more expensive when they are first released, but with this the standard and current Core Duo chips will be on clearance and will be a lot cheaper. This will result in the current laptops being much cheaper and there will be big sales, the same way there was when the Core duo's came out after the standard Pentium M.</p>
<p>To be honest id much rather use windows for Compatibility, but if you like Fancy desktops like what Vista will deliver, you may as well get an Apple, or wait till the new Core 2 Duo chips come out and get an apple MacBook or MacBook Pro.</p>
<p>OS X Tiger and the soon to be released Panther both are ran atop a Darwin BSD core. You may wonder what a Darwin BSD core is. Well it is a BSD Kernel which is the way that the University of California, Berkeley has chosen to write this kernel and it is atop a Pure UNIX Module. This may be confusing and unclear, but Im trying my Best. The kernel is the way the computer operates and manages its resources. It is also the way the software interacts with the hardware. BSD stands for Berkeley Software Distribution, and is atop UNIX and is true to UNIX. UNIX is an operating system developed in the late 1960's by bell labs and has pretty much been a force that cannot be beaten. Others try but it doesnt happen. UNIX is also what runs almost all the serves that make our complex Human Infrastructure Possible. Phones, Internet, Satellites and a slew of other things. Why do people use it because its pretty much Rock solid and has close to 50 years of advancement.</p>
<p>Apple uses the BSD kernel, and then developed a mach Microkernel which is what makes OS X what it is today. You can download Darwin for free, but it doesnt have the Microkernel here <a href="http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/%5B/url%5D">http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/</a>
And its 100% free.</p>
<p>OS X is very solid and a lot more solid that Windows, it just does not have the support of Windows in terms of Applications and Games mostly. But its a much better option.</p>
<p>I personally dont like the glitz of Os X and Windows Vista. My desktop looks like this pretty much but with a grey text <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://static.flickr.com/26/66130892_2bed7e67b9.jpg&imgrefurl=http://fuyichin.blogspot.com/2005/11/spreadsheet-on-unix.html&h=301&w=500&sz=135&tbnid=0FflUrrk4oNuYM:&tbnh=76&tbnw=127&hl=en&start=141&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dunix%26start%3D140%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN%5B/url%5D">http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://static.flickr.com/26/66130892_2bed7e67b9.jpg&imgrefurl=http://fuyichin.blogspot.com/2005/11/spreadsheet-on-unix.html&h=301&w=500&sz=135&tbnid=0FflUrrk4oNuYM:&tbnh=76&tbnw=127&hl=en&start=141&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dunix%26start%3D140%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN</a></p>
<p>I run FreeBSD and it is Solid and thats why I use it.</p>
<p>I hope this may have helped some people, if not Im sorry and Im sorry for my grammar and spelling. I know it needs work.</p>
<p>I am not sure if you will get a good deal like this again, thogh you never know that you could get a better one in the future.</p>