<p>I dunno. If traditional college experience means parties with 400 people in a barn, I think everyone’s agreed (and stated like fifty times) that things like that don’t happen here, with anywhere near the regularity one would expect if one’s point of reference for college were Animal House.</p>
<p>However, the vast majority of the “types of people who shouldn’t go to Columbia” listed below are almost certainly the result of an incredible misunderstanding of the core:</p>
<p>“a creative learner, a do-it-yourself type, someone who hates structure, someone who works outside the box”</p>
<p>All of these types of people fit in great at columbia. Someone probably looked at the fact that we had a core, assumed that meant everything at columbia was hyper-traditional (apparently forgot that 1968, or the hunger strike like three years ago, ever happened), and then concluded that people who don’t fit into a framework determined for them by the university wouldn’t enjoy columbia. </p>
<p>Nothing could be further from the truth. Why? </p>
<p>1) The core, like everything else at Columbia, is what you make it. If you get here and find that you hate the core, you will also quickly find that while it does end up being around 1/4 of your credits (adcoms say 1/3, but that’s based on 124 credits—almost all columbia students end up taking more than 124 credits before graduation), it can be far less than 1/4 of your total time spent on schoolwork. You can also be super passionate and intense about the core and read every book twice and be a core superstar.</p>
<p>2) The administration does very little hand-holding, taking a very hands-off approach to student life. While this does have its disadvantages (such as the fact that building bleachers for graduation resulted in Bacchanal getting moved to a different and inferior location, which is truly unacceptable on the part of the administration), it also has great advantages for do-it-yourself types. In fact, those are the people who most belong at Columbia, in my opinion. They won’t sit around waiting for their adviser to tell them what they need to do to finish the degree (hint: he or she won’t), they’ll get on the website and figure it out for themselves. They won’t just be annoyed by the lack of a sustainable development major or a linguistics major, they’ll go out and design their own (these are two majors that enough students did as independent majors that they became/are becoming official majors in their own right). </p>
<p>3) Anyone who doesn’t think that socialists can fit in at Columbia should come visit my CC class. And like every class at Columbia.</p>
<p>4) Anyone who doesn’t think activists can fit in at Columbia should try walking through campus on a sunny day and counting all the flyers they receive and all the bake sales they walk past.</p>
<p>5) If you don’t like big cities, you probably shouldn’t come to Columbia, not because you can’t have a big-city-less experience at Columbia (you totally can: you can live in housing that’s very close to campus every semester, and never leave morningside heights), but because you’ll miss out on some of the best things going to Columbia has to offer (NEW YORK CITY) and so you might as well let your spot at Columbia go to someone who will take better advantage of NYC. Of course if the choice is Columbia or a school with less academic rigor, fewer resources, etc., you should still come to Columbia, but if we’re comparing, say, Columbia and Brown or Amherst or Duke, etc.</p>
<p>But yeah, I’d imagine very independent people would perhaps have a harder time at HYP (particularly Princeton, if my impression of that school is correct) than in New York and at Columbia.</p>